Inducing ipsilateral motor‐evoked potentials in the biceps brachii muscle in healthy humans

To assess reticulospinal tract excitability, high-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to elicit ipsilateral motor-evoked potentials (iMEPs). However, there is no consensus on robust and valid methods for use in human studies. The present study proposes a standardized method for eliciting and analysing iMEPs in the biceps brachii. Twenty-four healthy young adults participated in this study. Electromyography (EMG) electrodes recorded contralateral MEPs (cMEPs) from the right and iMEPs from the left biceps brachii. A dynamic preacher curl task was used with ~15% of the subject's one-repetition maximum load. The protocol included maximal compound action potential (M-max) determination of the right biceps brachii muscle, TMS hotspot determination, and four sets of five repetitions where 100% stimulator output was delivered at an elbow angle of 110° of flexion. We normalized cMEP amplitude by M-max (% M-max) and iMEP by cMEP amplitude ratio (ICAR). Clear iMEPs above background EMG were observed in 21 subjects (88%, ICAR = .31 ± .19). Good-to-excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = .795-1.000) and low bias (.01-.08 mV and .60-1.11 ms) were demonstrated when comparing two different analysis methods (i.e. fixed time-window vs. manual onset detection) to determine the cMEP and iMEP amplitude and latency, respectively. Most subjects demonstrated clear iMEPs above background EMG triggered at a pre-determined joint angle during a light-load dynamic preacher curl exercise. Similar results were obtained when comparing a single-trial manual identification of iMEP and a semi-automated time-window data analysis approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.16548
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inducing ipsilateral motor‐evoked potentials in the biceps brachii muscle in healthy humans

Stuart N. Baker, Simon Walker, Nijia Hu, Meghan Tanel et al.
4 citations
European Journal of Neuroscience
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
0.99
article

Inducing ipsilateral motor‐evoked potentials in the biceps brachii muscle in healthy humans

Stuart N. Baker, Simon Walker, Nijia Hu, Meghan Tanel, Dawson J. Kidgell
article en
4 citations

Abstract

To assess reticulospinal tract excitability, high-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to elicit ipsilateral motor-evoked potentials (iMEPs). However, there is no consensus on robust and valid methods for use in human studies. The present study proposes a standardized method for eliciting and analysing iMEPs in the biceps brachii. Twenty-four healthy young adults participated in this study. Electromyography (EMG) electrodes recorded contralateral MEPs (cMEPs) from the right and iMEPs from the left biceps brachii. A dynamic preacher curl task was used with ~15% of the subject's one-repetition maximum load. The protocol included maximal compound action potential (M-max) determination of the right biceps brachii muscle, TMS hotspot determination, and four sets of five repetitions where 100% stimulator output was delivered at an elbow angle of 110° of flexion. We normalized cMEP amplitude by M-max (% M-max) and iMEP by cMEP amplitude ratio (ICAR). Clear iMEPs above background EMG were observed in 21 subjects (88%, ICAR = .31 ± .19). Good-to-excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = .795-1.000) and low bias (.01-.08 mV and .60-1.11 ms) were demonstrated when comparing two different analysis methods (i.e. fixed time-window vs. manual onset detection) to determine the cMEP and iMEP amplitude and latency, respectively. Most subjects demonstrated clear iMEPs above background EMG triggered at a pre-determined joint angle during a light-load dynamic preacher curl exercise. Similar results were obtained when comparing a single-trial manual identification of iMEP and a semi-automated time-window data analysis approach.

European Journal of NeuroscienceVol. 60(9)
Monash University (AU), Newcastle University (GB), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
0.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.