Advanced Wind Power Forecasting

The popularity of LSTM networks in wind prediction is due to their inherent capabilities in handling the long-term dependencies of sequential data. This normally outperforms traditional methods like ARIMA. However, current work has illustrated that EMD-based approaches outperform LSTM models in many critical performance metrics. Although it is very powerful in gathering historical patterns due to the enhanced gating mechanisms, LSTM has a lot of challenges regarding computational efficiency and flexibility. EMD models overwhelmingly outperformed the LSTM model in computational time by probably about 20-25%, thereby solving a weakness that may be one of the intrinsic weaknesses of the LSTM model. In addition, the EMD models improved by about 2-4% in accuracy as compared to LSTM, thus evidencing better ability in the prediction of the wind data. On feature extraction, EMD did better, improving by 7% over LSTM. Moreover, EMD has better robustness and adaptability, with improvements of 6% and 4%, respectively. This introduction of EMD does bring a bit of an increase in model complexity, this disadvantage is rather insignificant when compared with the huge advantages it brings in efficiency and accuracy. While an LSTM network is very good at modeling a long-term relationship, it suffers from some problems in handling nonlinear interactions and continuous series data, thus its effectiveness may be limited in some cases of forecasting. In contrast, EMD has a clear advantage in real-time applications owing to enhanced efficiency and precision. From the results obtained in this study, it becomes easy to envision that the EMD methodology is un-equivocally better than LSTM in all the critical aspects, such as computational efficiency, accuracy in prediction, feature extraction, resilience, and adaptability when used individually. Results indicate that EMD has a more constructive methodology toward wind pattern predictions, beating LSTM on many measures of performance. The advantages presented should be maximized in future studies aimed at further improving and optimizing a wind-forecasting system, with special attention toward EMD's benefits in gaining more accurate and efficient forecasts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovative Computing and Emerging Technologies
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56536/jicet.v4i2.135
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advanced Wind Power Forecasting

Abdul Sami
Journal of Innovative Computing and Emerging Technologies
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
article

Advanced Wind Power Forecasting

Abdul Sami
article en

Abstract

The popularity of LSTM networks in wind prediction is due to their inherent capabilities in handling the long-term dependencies of sequential data. This normally outperforms traditional methods like ARIMA. However, current work has illustrated that EMD-based approaches outperform LSTM models in many critical performance metrics. Although it is very powerful in gathering historical patterns due to the enhanced gating mechanisms, LSTM has a lot of challenges regarding computational efficiency and flexibility. EMD models overwhelmingly outperformed the LSTM model in computational time by probably about 20-25%, thereby solving a weakness that may be one of the intrinsic weaknesses of the LSTM model. In addition, the EMD models improved by about 2-4% in accuracy as compared to LSTM, thus evidencing better ability in the prediction of the wind data. On feature extraction, EMD did better, improving by 7% over LSTM. Moreover, EMD has better robustness and adaptability, with improvements of 6% and 4%, respectively. This introduction of EMD does bring a bit of an increase in model complexity, this disadvantage is rather insignificant when compared with the huge advantages it brings in efficiency and accuracy. While an LSTM network is very good at modeling a long-term relationship, it suffers from some problems in handling nonlinear interactions and continuous series data, thus its effectiveness may be limited in some cases of forecasting. In contrast, EMD has a clear advantage in real-time applications owing to enhanced efficiency and precision. From the results obtained in this study, it becomes easy to envision that the EMD methodology is un-equivocally better than LSTM in all the critical aspects, such as computational efficiency, accuracy in prediction, feature extraction, resilience, and adaptability when used individually. Results indicate that EMD has a more constructive methodology toward wind pattern predictions, beating LSTM on many measures of performance. The advantages presented should be maximized in future studies aimed at further improving and optimizing a wind-forecasting system, with special attention toward EMD's benefits in gaining more accurate and efficient forecasts.

Journal of Innovative Computing and Emerging TechnologiesVol. 4(2)
Superior University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Advanced Wind Power Forecasting — Abdul Sami · Journal of Innovative Computing and Emerging Technologies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS