Validity of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire Short-Form (PPAQ-SF)

To develop and evaluate the validity of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (PPAQ-SF). A prospective cohort of participants (N=50) completed the updated PPAQ (long-form) and wore an ActiGraph for 7 days on the nondominant wrist in early, mid, and late pregnancy. The top ten questions with the highest relative contribution to the between-person variance in PPAQ-assessed total MET-hours/day were selected. Internal validity was evaluated using the ActiGraph and the updated PPAQ (long-form) within the current dataset. Validity was also assessed in an external validation dataset of 222 pregnant participants using the updated and original PPAQ (long-forms). Spearman correlations between the PPAQ-SF and ActiGraph estimates of MVPA MET-hours/day were r = 0.34 (95% CI 0.18-0.48) for overall pregnancy and ranged from 0.21 (95% CI -0.07-0.47) in early pregnancy to 0.49 (95% CI 0.23-0.69) in mid-pregnancy. In the external validation dataset, correlations between the PPAQ-SF and the PPAQ (long forms) estimates of MVPA MET-hours/day were statistically significant across pregnancy (r=0.94-0.99). Reproducibility ranged from 0.35 in early pregnancy to 0.77 in mid pregnancy. In summary, the PPAQ-SF can provide a time-efficient measure of MVPA during pregnancy with acceptable validity; reproducibility was reasonable in mid-pregnancy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae382
Primary Topic
Pregnancy-related medical research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire Short-Form (PPAQ-SF)

Penelope S. Pekow, John Staudenmayer, Patty S. Freedson, Lisa Chasan‐Taber et al.
American Journal of Epidemiology
Pregnancy-related medical research
article

Validity of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire Short-Form (PPAQ-SF)

Penelope S. Pekow, John Staudenmayer, Patty S. Freedson, Lisa Chasan‐Taber, Robert T. Marcotte, John R. Sirard, Nicole A. VanKim, Susan Park, Scott J. Strath
article en

Abstract

To develop and evaluate the validity of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (PPAQ-SF). A prospective cohort of participants (N=50) completed the updated PPAQ (long-form) and wore an ActiGraph for 7 days on the nondominant wrist in early, mid, and late pregnancy. The top ten questions with the highest relative contribution to the between-person variance in PPAQ-assessed total MET-hours/day were selected. Internal validity was evaluated using the ActiGraph and the updated PPAQ (long-form) within the current dataset. Validity was also assessed in an external validation dataset of 222 pregnant participants using the updated and original PPAQ (long-forms). Spearman correlations between the PPAQ-SF and ActiGraph estimates of MVPA MET-hours/day were r = 0.34 (95% CI 0.18-0.48) for overall pregnancy and ranged from 0.21 (95% CI -0.07-0.47) in early pregnancy to 0.49 (95% CI 0.23-0.69) in mid-pregnancy. In the external validation dataset, correlations between the PPAQ-SF and the PPAQ (long forms) estimates of MVPA MET-hours/day were statistically significant across pregnancy (r=0.94-0.99). Reproducibility ranged from 0.35 in early pregnancy to 0.77 in mid pregnancy. In summary, the PPAQ-SF can provide a time-efficient measure of MVPA during pregnancy with acceptable validity; reproducibility was reasonable in mid-pregnancy.

American Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 194(7)
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Milwaukee Health Department (US), University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Pregnancy-related medical research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.