THE POLITICS OF JUSTICE-BASED INTERNATIONAL BANKRUPTCY LAW

The purpose of this study is to analyze international legal regulations regarding cross-border bankruptcy that are not yet fair, and to analyze international bankruptcy legal policies based on justice that can be applied effectively in a cross-border context. This study uses normative legal research. The results of this study are differences in the application of the territorial principle and the universality principle in various countries can cause injustice to debtors and creditors. The territorial principle can make it difficult for debtors who have separate assets in several countries, so they have to face bankruptcy processes separately in several countries, while the universality principle can cause injustice because creditors can be harmed by the application of the debtor's original law which is more beneficial to the debtor. Restorative justice emphasizes the restoration of losses for the injured party. The restorative justice approach can help reduce conflict in the international bankruptcy process and encourage solutions that prioritize mediation in its resolution. With the restorative justice approach, it is expected to provide justice for all parties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v11i3.39589
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE POLITICS OF JUSTICE-BASED INTERNATIONAL BANKRUPTCY LAW

Erwin Owan Hermansyah Soetoto
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
article

THE POLITICS OF JUSTICE-BASED INTERNATIONAL BANKRUPTCY LAW

Erwin Owan Hermansyah Soetoto
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze international legal regulations regarding cross-border bankruptcy that are not yet fair, and to analyze international bankruptcy legal policies based on justice that can be applied effectively in a cross-border context. This study uses normative legal research. The results of this study are differences in the application of the territorial principle and the universality principle in various countries can cause injustice to debtors and creditors. The territorial principle can make it difficult for debtors who have separate assets in several countries, so they have to face bankruptcy processes separately in several countries, while the universality principle can cause injustice because creditors can be harmed by the application of the debtor's original law which is more beneficial to the debtor. Restorative justice emphasizes the restoration of losses for the injured party. The restorative justice approach can help reduce conflict in the international bankruptcy process and encourage solutions that prioritize mediation in its resolution. With the restorative justice approach, it is expected to provide justice for all parties.

Jurnal Pembaharuan HukumVol. 11(3)
Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

THE POLITICS OF JUSTICE-BASED INTERNATIONAL BANKRUPTCY LAW — Erwin Owan Hermansyah Soetoto · Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS