Identifying the institutional modalities for commencing Environmental-Economic Accounting for the ocean

Ocean Accounting (OA) is an emergent framework to collate environmental, economic, and social data in a standardised manner, aligned with existing international statistical accounting standards. This involves the recording of the interactions between the ocean and the economy, considering both the contributions of the ocean to economic activities and the impacts of human activities on the ocean. The OA framework offers a multidisciplinary approach to deriving statistics and indicators that consider the ocean’s contribution to society and the economy. As implementation of OA increases globally, there is a need to understand the modalities in which governments commence activities, including potential impacts to the use and maintenance of accounts into the future. Here, we conduct a global review of countries that have commenced OA activities and define the modes of implementation across 24 identified countries. Two modes were identified, (i) government-led (13 countries) and (ii) externally led (i.e., non-government institutions, 11 countries). To determine the strategic and operational implications associated with each mode, the study performed a Strength-Weakness-Opportunity-Threat (SWOT) analysis via expert elicitation. The SWOT analysis of government-led implementation identified strengths in centralised coordination and alignment with policies, but weaknesses included limited expertise and resources. External institutions (e.g., universities or consultants), despite offering diverse expertise and cost-effectiveness, face challenges such as legitimacy issues and misalignment with government policies, posing risks to program sustainability. As OA activities progress, countries may transition from externally led implementation to government-led projects. Understanding each mode's implications offers important insights for countries considering future implementation of OA. • The implementation mode of twenty-four countries conducting Ocean Accounting was assessed. • Identified modes were government (13) or externally led (11) across countries. • Government-led activities provided coordination but may not have necessary expertise. • Externally-led activities may risk future compilation without knowledge transfer. • Further research could sub-divide modes and explore transitions between them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Policy
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106410
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying the institutional modalities for commencing Environmental-Economic Accounting for the ocean

Ben Milligan, Teerapong Praphotjanaporn, Maria Alarcon Blazquez, Jordan Gacutan et al.
2 citations
Marine Policy
Coastal and Marine Management
1.42
article

Identifying the institutional modalities for commencing Environmental-Economic Accounting for the ocean

Ben Milligan, Teerapong Praphotjanaporn, Maria Alarcon Blazquez, Jordan Gacutan, Laura Trueb
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Ocean Accounting (OA) is an emergent framework to collate environmental, economic, and social data in a standardised manner, aligned with existing international statistical accounting standards. This involves the recording of the interactions between the ocean and the economy, considering both the contributions of the ocean to economic activities and the impacts of human activities on the ocean. The OA framework offers a multidisciplinary approach to deriving statistics and indicators that consider the ocean’s contribution to society and the economy. As implementation of OA increases globally, there is a need to understand the modalities in which governments commence activities, including potential impacts to the use and maintenance of accounts into the future. Here, we conduct a global review of countries that have commenced OA activities and define the modes of implementation across 24 identified countries. Two modes were identified, (i) government-led (13 countries) and (ii) externally led (i.e., non-government institutions, 11 countries). To determine the strategic and operational implications associated with each mode, the study performed a Strength-Weakness-Opportunity-Threat (SWOT) analysis via expert elicitation. The SWOT analysis of government-led implementation identified strengths in centralised coordination and alignment with policies, but weaknesses included limited expertise and resources. External institutions (e.g., universities or consultants), despite offering diverse expertise and cost-effectiveness, face challenges such as legitimacy issues and misalignment with government policies, posing risks to program sustainability. As OA activities progress, countries may transition from externally led implementation to government-led projects. Understanding each mode's implications offers important insights for countries considering future implementation of OA. • The implementation mode of twenty-four countries conducting Ocean Accounting was assessed. • Identified modes were government (13) or externally led (11) across countries. • Government-led activities provided coordination but may not have necessary expertise. • Externally-led activities may risk future compilation without knowledge transfer. • Further research could sub-divide modes and explore transitions between them.

Marine PolicyVol. 170
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Coastal and Marine Management
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.