A Study on the Ranking Framework based on NFT Artworks Valuation

The objective of this study is to devise and propose a ranking framework for NFT artworks and artists, based on the valuation of NFT artworks. The findings of this study can be summarised as follows. Firstly, the results demonstrate that the cost production, S2F method, and quint algorithm approaches, which are commonly employed in classical economics, are the most effective models for valuing NFT artworks. Secondly, quantitative evaluation criteria for NFT artworks were proposed, including factors such as exhibitions and awards, copyrights, exhibition planning, career achievements and assigned weights. Additionally, qualitative evaluation criteria were put forth, encompassing aspects such as content, expression, originality, collectible value and assigned weights. The results of the recognition evaluation criteria were also derived. Furthermore, a framework was put forth to guarantee the rationality of the NFT artist ranking through verification. The anticipated outcomes of this research can be leveraged for the equitable utilisation of NFT artworks for purchase and sale, the establishment of guidelines for the calculation, settlement, and distribution of artworks, and the encouragement of new NFT art creation.

Publication Details

Journal
Korea Institute of Design Research Society
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46248/kidrs.2024.3.85
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on the Ranking Framework based on NFT Artworks Valuation

1 citations
Korea Institute of Design Research Society
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
1.96
article

A Study on the Ranking Framework based on NFT Artworks Valuation

article en
1 citations

Abstract

The objective of this study is to devise and propose a ranking framework for NFT artworks and artists, based on the valuation of NFT artworks. The findings of this study can be summarised as follows. Firstly, the results demonstrate that the cost production, S2F method, and quint algorithm approaches, which are commonly employed in classical economics, are the most effective models for valuing NFT artworks. Secondly, quantitative evaluation criteria for NFT artworks were proposed, including factors such as exhibitions and awards, copyrights, exhibition planning, career achievements and assigned weights. Additionally, qualitative evaluation criteria were put forth, encompassing aspects such as content, expression, originality, collectible value and assigned weights. The results of the recognition evaluation criteria were also derived. Furthermore, a framework was put forth to guarantee the rationality of the NFT artist ranking through verification. The anticipated outcomes of this research can be leveraged for the equitable utilisation of NFT artworks for purchase and sale, the establishment of guidelines for the calculation, settlement, and distribution of artworks, and the encouragement of new NFT art creation.

Korea Institute of Design Research SocietyVol. 9(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.