Psychological impacts of AI use on school students: a systematic scoping review of the empirical literature

This systematic scoping review aimed to collate evidence assessing associations between AI use and psychological outcomes (including cognitive, emotional, and behavioural responses to these intelligent systems) for school students from preschool (age <5 years), primary school (age 5–11 years), middle school (age 12–14 years), to high school (age 15–18 years). Original empirical studies were identified in seven reliable databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, ScienceDirect, IEEE, and ERIC), resulting in 189 eligible studies. From these, we have identified 24 relevant studies reporting students’ hands-on experiential learning outcomes on AI use. Findings revealed that the use of AI in schools can have both positive and negative impacts on the psychological well-being of students. Increased engagement, cognitive achievement, self-efficacy, learning autonomy, and decreased frustration are among the benefits of this strategy; nevertheless, over reliance, anxiety, stress, social isolation, unstable mental health, and moral dilemmas including privacy, bias, and justice are among its drawbacks. Overall, the psychological impacts of AI use among school students are multifaceted, context-dependent and across grades. By carefully considering the design, implementation, and ethical decorum of AI in school education, teachers and policymakers can maximise its benefits by mitigating potential risks in practicing technology enhanced learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2025.20030
Citations
20
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological impacts of AI use on school students: a systematic scoping review of the empirical literature

Tripti Bej, Arnab Kundu
20 citations
Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning
AI in Service Interactions
6.95
article

Psychological impacts of AI use on school students: a systematic scoping review of the empirical literature

Tripti Bej, Arnab Kundu
article en
20 citations

Abstract

This systematic scoping review aimed to collate evidence assessing associations between AI use and psychological outcomes (including cognitive, emotional, and behavioural responses to these intelligent systems) for school students from preschool (age <5 years), primary school (age 5–11 years), middle school (age 12–14 years), to high school (age 15–18 years). Original empirical studies were identified in seven reliable databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, ScienceDirect, IEEE, and ERIC), resulting in 189 eligible studies. From these, we have identified 24 relevant studies reporting students’ hands-on experiential learning outcomes on AI use. Findings revealed that the use of AI in schools can have both positive and negative impacts on the psychological well-being of students. Increased engagement, cognitive achievement, self-efficacy, learning autonomy, and decreased frustration are among the benefits of this strategy; nevertheless, over reliance, anxiety, stress, social isolation, unstable mental health, and moral dilemmas including privacy, bias, and justice are among its drawbacks. Overall, the psychological impacts of AI use among school students are multifaceted, context-dependent and across grades. By carefully considering the design, implementation, and ethical decorum of AI in school education, teachers and policymakers can maximise its benefits by mitigating potential risks in practicing technology enhanced learning.

Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced LearningVol. 20
Institute of Educational Policy (GR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
AI in Service Interactions
6.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.