Multiple fairness criteria in decision tree learning

The use of algorithmic decision-making systems based on machine learning models has led to a need for fair (unbiased) and explainable classification outcomes. In particular, machine learning algorithms can encode biases, which might result in discriminatory decisions for certain groups such as gender, race, or age. Although a number of works on decision tree learning have been proposed to decrease the chance of discrimination, they usually focus on the use of a single fairness metric. In general, creating a model based on a single fairness metric is not a sufficient way to mitigate discrimination since bias can originate from various sources—e.g., the data itself or the optimization process. In this paper, we propose a novel decision tree learning process that utilizes multiple fairness metrics to address both group and individual discrimination. This is achieved by extending the attribute selection procedure to consider not only information gain but also gain in fairness. Computational experiments on fourteen different datasets with various sensitive features demonstrate that the proposed Fair-C4.5 models improve fairness without a loss in predictive accuracy when compared to the well-known C4.5 and the fairness-aware FFTree algorithms. • We propose a new algorithm that employs fairness in decision tree construction. • Fair-C4.5 uses individual and group fairness metrics to mitigate discrimination. • Fairness-based attribute selection strategies balance accuracy and fairness. • Results show improvements in fairness without decrease of predictive accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Soft Computing
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112313
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiple fairness criteria in decision tree learning

Fernando E. B. Otero, Meryem Bagriacik
4 citations
Applied Soft Computing
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.10
article

Multiple fairness criteria in decision tree learning

Fernando E. B. Otero, Meryem Bagriacik
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The use of algorithmic decision-making systems based on machine learning models has led to a need for fair (unbiased) and explainable classification outcomes. In particular, machine learning algorithms can encode biases, which might result in discriminatory decisions for certain groups such as gender, race, or age. Although a number of works on decision tree learning have been proposed to decrease the chance of discrimination, they usually focus on the use of a single fairness metric. In general, creating a model based on a single fairness metric is not a sufficient way to mitigate discrimination since bias can originate from various sources—e.g., the data itself or the optimization process. In this paper, we propose a novel decision tree learning process that utilizes multiple fairness metrics to address both group and individual discrimination. This is achieved by extending the attribute selection procedure to consider not only information gain but also gain in fairness. Computational experiments on fourteen different datasets with various sensitive features demonstrate that the proposed Fair-C4.5 models improve fairness without a loss in predictive accuracy when compared to the well-known C4.5 and the fairness-aware FFTree algorithms. • We propose a new algorithm that employs fairness in decision tree construction. • Fair-C4.5 uses individual and group fairness metrics to mitigate discrimination. • Fairness-based attribute selection strategies balance accuracy and fairness. • Results show improvements in fairness without decrease of predictive accuracy.

Applied Soft ComputingVol. 167
University of Kent (GB)
Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional, Milli Eğitim Bakanliği
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.