Antarctic sea ice surface temperature bias in atmospheric reanalyses induced by the combined effects of sea ice and clouds

Abstract Sea-ice surface temperature from atmospheric reanalysis has been used as an indicator of ice melt and climate change. However, its performance in atmospheric reanalyses is not fully understood in Antarctica. Here, we quantified biases in six widely-used reanalyses using satellite observations, and found strong and persistent warm biases in most reanalyses examined. Further analysis of the biases revealed two main culprits: incorrect cloud properties, and inappropriate sea-ice representation in the reanalysis products. We found that overestimated cloud simulation can contribute more than 4 K warm bias, with ERA5 exhibiting the largest warm bias. Even in reanalysis with smaller biases, this accuracy is achieved through a compensatory relationship between relatively lower cloud fraction bias and overestimated sea ice insulation effect. A dynamic downscaling simulation shows that differences in sea-ice representation can contribute a 2.3 K warm bias. The representation of ice concentration is the primary driver of the spatial distribution of biases by modulating the coupling between sea ice and clouds, as well as surface heat conduction. The lack of a snow layer in all reanalyses examined also has an impact on biases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01692-1
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antarctic sea ice surface temperature bias in atmospheric reanalyses induced by the combined effects of sea ice and clouds

Richard Coleman, Alexander D. Fraser, Siobhan O’Farrell, Phillip Reid et al.
5 citations
Communications Earth & Environment
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
1.88
article

Antarctic sea ice surface temperature bias in atmospheric reanalyses induced by the combined effects of sea ice and clouds

Richard Coleman, Alexander D. Fraser, Siobhan O’Farrell, Phillip Reid, Zhaohui Wang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Sea-ice surface temperature from atmospheric reanalysis has been used as an indicator of ice melt and climate change. However, its performance in atmospheric reanalyses is not fully understood in Antarctica. Here, we quantified biases in six widely-used reanalyses using satellite observations, and found strong and persistent warm biases in most reanalyses examined. Further analysis of the biases revealed two main culprits: incorrect cloud properties, and inappropriate sea-ice representation in the reanalysis products. We found that overestimated cloud simulation can contribute more than 4 K warm bias, with ERA5 exhibiting the largest warm bias. Even in reanalysis with smaller biases, this accuracy is achieved through a compensatory relationship between relatively lower cloud fraction bias and overestimated sea ice insulation effect. A dynamic downscaling simulation shows that differences in sea-ice representation can contribute a 2.3 K warm bias. The representation of ice concentration is the primary driver of the spatial distribution of biases by modulating the coupling between sea ice and clouds, as well as surface heat conduction. The lack of a snow layer in all reanalyses examined also has an impact on biases.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 5(1)
CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (AU), Bureau of Meteorology (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), Australian Antarctic Division (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (AU)
Australian Government, University of Tasmania
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.