No man’s hand: artificial intelligence does not improve police report writing speed

Abstract Objectives This study examines the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to reduce the time police officers spend writing reports, a task that consumes a significant portion of their workday. Methods In a pre-registered randomized controlled trial, we test this claim within the patrol division of a medium-sized police department ( n = 85) at the individual report level ( n = 755). Analyses utilize mixed-effects regression accounting for the nested structure of report-writing. Results AI assistance did not significantly affect the duration of writing police reports. Alternative specifications beyond those specified in the pre-registration, including a difference-in-differences approach observing report duration over a full year ( n = 6084), confirm the null findings are robust. Conclusions Our findings contradict marketing expectations for the effect of this technology, suggesting no time savings in report-writing can be expected when using AI-assisted report-writing. Several other potential effects remain possible and untested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-024-09644-7
Citations
9
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No man’s hand: artificial intelligence does not improve police report writing speed

Kyle McLean, Ian Tyler Adams, Hunter M. Boehme, Irick A. Geary et al.
9 citations
Journal of Experimental Criminology
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
20.08
article

No man’s hand: artificial intelligence does not improve police report writing speed

Kyle McLean, Ian Tyler Adams, Hunter M. Boehme, Irick A. Geary, Matt Barter
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This study examines the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to reduce the time police officers spend writing reports, a task that consumes a significant portion of their workday. Methods In a pre-registered randomized controlled trial, we test this claim within the patrol division of a medium-sized police department ( n = 85) at the individual report level ( n = 755). Analyses utilize mixed-effects regression accounting for the nested structure of report-writing. Results AI assistance did not significantly affect the duration of writing police reports. Alternative specifications beyond those specified in the pre-registration, including a difference-in-differences approach observing report duration over a full year ( n = 6084), confirm the null findings are robust. Conclusions Our findings contradict marketing expectations for the effect of this technology, suggesting no time savings in report-writing can be expected when using AI-assisted report-writing. Several other potential effects remain possible and untested.

Journal of Experimental CriminologyVol. 22(1)
University of South Carolina (US), Clemson University (US)
University of South Carolina
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
20.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

No man’s hand: artificial intelligence does not improve police report writing speed — Kyle McLean, Ian Tyler Adams, et al. · Journal of Experimental Criminology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS