A Comparative Analysis of the EU AI Act and the Colorado AI Act: Regulatory Approaches to Artificial Intelligence Governance

This comparative study examines the EU AI Act and the Colorado AI Act, focusing on their regulatory approaches to artificial intelligence.The EU AI Act provides a comprehensive framework with a risk-based classification, emphasizing transparency, accountability, and the protection of fundamental rights across diverse sectors.It aims to set a global benchmark for AI governance, influencing international standards.The Colorado AI Act targets high-risk AI systems, prioritizing consumer protection, fairness, and the prevention of algorithmic discrimination.It mandates detailed documentation, risk management, and transparency measures to ensure ethical AI deployment.This analysis explores the impacts of each act on innovation, industry practices, and consumer protection, as well as their potential global influence.The findings highlight the strengths and challenges of both regulatory approaches, offering insights into future directions for AI governance and the potential for harmonizing international AI regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Computer Applications
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2024923954
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of the EU AI Act and the Colorado AI Act: Regulatory Approaches to Artificial Intelligence Governance

Mayur Jariwala
International Journal of Computer Applications
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A Comparative Analysis of the EU AI Act and the Colorado AI Act: Regulatory Approaches to Artificial Intelligence Governance

Mayur Jariwala
article en

Abstract

This comparative study examines the EU AI Act and the Colorado AI Act, focusing on their regulatory approaches to artificial intelligence.The EU AI Act provides a comprehensive framework with a risk-based classification, emphasizing transparency, accountability, and the protection of fundamental rights across diverse sectors.It aims to set a global benchmark for AI governance, influencing international standards.The Colorado AI Act targets high-risk AI systems, prioritizing consumer protection, fairness, and the prevention of algorithmic discrimination.It mandates detailed documentation, risk management, and transparency measures to ensure ethical AI deployment.This analysis explores the impacts of each act on innovation, industry practices, and consumer protection, as well as their potential global influence.The findings highlight the strengths and challenges of both regulatory approaches, offering insights into future directions for AI governance and the potential for harmonizing international AI regulations.

International Journal of Computer ApplicationsVol. 186(38)
University of the Cumberlands (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Analysis of the EU AI Act and the Colorado AI Act: Regulatory Approaches to Artificial Intelligence Governance — Mayur Jariwala · International Journal of Computer Applications (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS