Can Taxonomists Think? Reversing the AI Equation

Confusion between the means and ends, specifically between technological achievements and their users, has been evident in taxonomy’s history since the end of the last century. Following a current of thought implicit in Anglo-Saxon culture, this trend aligns with the idea of inevitability. It is inevitable, so it is thought, that what a human organism can do, a machine will be able to do at some point in time. This will ultimately lead to dispensing with the human element for things they do not wish to do themselves. Despite certain misunderstandings about what has become known as the Turing Test, the general idea is to determine whether a machine can analyze data as meaningfully as a human does and make decisions based on that analysis. In the case of taxonomy, the initial aim of using machines was to efficiently replace a researcher for identification purposes. The situation later evolved to include the discovery of new entities in addition to identification. In this essay, I provide a brief overview of some milestones along this trajectory and its current state and discuss the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) in taxonomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Taxonomy
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy4040037
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Taxonomists Think? Reversing the AI Equation

Antonio G. Valdecasas
3 citations
Taxonomy
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
0.70
article

Can Taxonomists Think? Reversing the AI Equation

Antonio G. Valdecasas
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Confusion between the means and ends, specifically between technological achievements and their users, has been evident in taxonomy’s history since the end of the last century. Following a current of thought implicit in Anglo-Saxon culture, this trend aligns with the idea of inevitability. It is inevitable, so it is thought, that what a human organism can do, a machine will be able to do at some point in time. This will ultimately lead to dispensing with the human element for things they do not wish to do themselves. Despite certain misunderstandings about what has become known as the Turing Test, the general idea is to determine whether a machine can analyze data as meaningfully as a human does and make decisions based on that analysis. In the case of taxonomy, the initial aim of using machines was to efficiently replace a researcher for identification purposes. The situation later evolved to include the discovery of new entities in addition to identification. In this essay, I provide a brief overview of some milestones along this trajectory and its current state and discuss the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) in taxonomy.

TaxonomyVol. 4(4)
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
0.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can Taxonomists Think? Reversing the AI Equation — Antonio G. Valdecasas · Taxonomy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS