Linear instability of viscous parallel shear flows: revisiting the perturbation no-slip condition

Linear stability analysis currently fails to predict turbulence transition in canonical viscous flows. We show that two alternative models of the boundary condition for incipient perturbations at solid walls produce linear instabilities that could be sufficient to explain turbulence transition. In many cases, the near-wall behaviour of the discovered instabilities is empirically indistinguishable from the classical no-slip condition. The ability of these alternative boundary conditions to predict linear instabilities that are consistent with turbulence transition suggests that the no-slip condition may be an overly simplified model of fluid–solid interface physics, particularly as a description of the flow perturbations that lead to turbulence transition in wall-bounded flows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2024.806
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linear instability of viscous parallel shear flows: revisiting the perturbation no-slip condition

John O. Dabiri, Anthony Leonard
1 citations
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
0.37
article

Linear instability of viscous parallel shear flows: revisiting the perturbation no-slip condition

John O. Dabiri, Anthony Leonard
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Linear stability analysis currently fails to predict turbulence transition in canonical viscous flows. We show that two alternative models of the boundary condition for incipient perturbations at solid walls produce linear instabilities that could be sufficient to explain turbulence transition. In many cases, the near-wall behaviour of the discovered instabilities is empirically indistinguishable from the classical no-slip condition. The ability of these alternative boundary conditions to predict linear instabilities that are consistent with turbulence transition suggests that the no-slip condition may be an overly simplified model of fluid–solid interface physics, particularly as a description of the flow perturbations that lead to turbulence transition in wall-bounded flows.

Journal of Fluid MechanicsVol. 996
California Institute of Technology (US)
National Science Foundation
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.