Advances in weather and climate extreme studies: a systematic comparative review

There is a growing evidence-based concerns pointing to global increase of weather and climate extreme events (WCEE). What decides whether these hazards become a disaster is how the society and humanity prepare and responds to it. Although various researchers have step up efforts through scholarly contributions in response to WCEE. However, the task of utilizing the needed tools, selecting the most suitable approach, and choosing appropriate techniques for WCEE studies can be daunting for researchers. Moreover, the technicality and complexity associated with the wide array of models and methods present additional challenges when it comes to their practical implementationF in disaster applications. This review comprehensively explores four approaches in WCEE studies: statistical analysis, geospatial modeling, MCDA, and AI-based techniques. It evaluates their effectiveness in assessing impacts within WCEE and highlights AI’s (ML and DL’s) superior performance compared to other conventional methods in disaster-related studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Geoscience
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-024-00079-1
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advances in weather and climate extreme studies: a systematic comparative review

Zakiah Ponrahono, Kamil Muhammad Kafi
5 citations
Discover Geoscience
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.41
article

Advances in weather and climate extreme studies: a systematic comparative review

Zakiah Ponrahono, Kamil Muhammad Kafi
article en
5 citations

Abstract

There is a growing evidence-based concerns pointing to global increase of weather and climate extreme events (WCEE). What decides whether these hazards become a disaster is how the society and humanity prepare and responds to it. Although various researchers have step up efforts through scholarly contributions in response to WCEE. However, the task of utilizing the needed tools, selecting the most suitable approach, and choosing appropriate techniques for WCEE studies can be daunting for researchers. Moreover, the technicality and complexity associated with the wide array of models and methods present additional challenges when it comes to their practical implementationF in disaster applications. This review comprehensively explores four approaches in WCEE studies: statistical analysis, geospatial modeling, MCDA, and AI-based techniques. It evaluates their effectiveness in assessing impacts within WCEE and highlights AI’s (ML and DL’s) superior performance compared to other conventional methods in disaster-related studies.

Discover GeoscienceVol. 2(1)
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY), Bayero University Kano (NG)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.