Comparison of remote and in‐person respiratory function grading of brachycephalic dogs
Remote RFG, as measured in this study, is not reliable for assigning RFG scores. Modifications could be made to remote evaluation to improve reliability. Based upon the performance of novice evaluators, training of evaluators is justified.
Authors
- Kelley M. Thieman Mankin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5618-1600)
- Jane Ladlow (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8076-4021)
- Kathleen Ham
- Nick D. Jeffery (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9812-1788)
- Carrie Stefaniak
- Zong H. Peng
Institutions
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University of Florida (US)
- Sunrise Medical (United States) (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Veterinary Surgery
- Published
- 2024-10-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14171
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.84