Real-World Efficacy of Biological Therapies in Severe Asthma: A Focus on Small Airways

<b>Background</b>: Severe asthma is a challenging condition that often resists traditional treatments and requires high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and other controllers to manage uncontrolled symptoms. Recent advances include the use of biologic agents targeting specific inflammation pathways, which have improved symptom control and quality of life, although their effects on small airways remain less understood. <b>Methods</b>: This prospective observational study, conducted at Tor Vergata University Hospital in Rome from July 2021 to March 2024, aims to evaluate the efficacy of treatments in patients with uncontrolled severe asthma. It involves baseline assessments and follow-ups at 1 and 3 months post-biological therapy initiation, focusing on both spirometric and non-spirometric (oscillometry) measurements of the small airways to provide a comprehensive evaluation of respiratory function. <b>Results</b>: This study, conducted from July 2021 to March 2024, enrolled 40 patients with severe asthma, ultimately analyzing data from 31 participants who underwent biological therapy. The results showed significant improvements in asthma symptoms, the ACT scores increased significantly from visit 1 to visit 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.00008) and from visit 1 to visit 3 (<i>p</i> = 0.00047), and pulmonary function tests, with notable increases in FEV1 (from visit 1 (74.97 ± 23.43%) to visit 2 (82.96 ± 26.57%, <i>p</i> = 0.041) and to visit 3 (88.89 ± 31.41%, <i>p</i> = 0.003)) and quality of life scores, and substantial reductions in specific airway resistance and small airway dysfunction markers (the PEF, %pr post-BD showed significant improvement from visit 1 to visit 3 (<i>p</i> = 0.012)). However, oscillometric measurements showed no significant changes post-therapy. <b>Conclusions</b>: The study concluded that there was an improvement in the small airways measured by non-oscillometric values, without significant improvements in oscillometric parameters. Additionally, a significant improvement in symptoms was observed after the first month of therapy. There was also a significant increase in respiratory function after one to three months of therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195883
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-World Efficacy of Biological Therapies in Severe Asthma: A Focus on Small Airways

Patrizia De Marco, Luigino Calzetta, Josuel Ora, Enrico Motta et al.
6 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Asthma and respiratory diseases
1.96
article

Real-World Efficacy of Biological Therapies in Severe Asthma: A Focus on Small Airways

Patrizia De Marco, Luigino Calzetta, Josuel Ora, Enrico Motta, Rossella Laitano, Paola Rogliani
article en
6 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Severe asthma is a challenging condition that often resists traditional treatments and requires high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and other controllers to manage uncontrolled symptoms. Recent advances include the use of biologic agents targeting specific inflammation pathways, which have improved symptom control and quality of life, although their effects on small airways remain less understood. <b>Methods</b>: This prospective observational study, conducted at Tor Vergata University Hospital in Rome from July 2021 to March 2024, aims to evaluate the efficacy of treatments in patients with uncontrolled severe asthma. It involves baseline assessments and follow-ups at 1 and 3 months post-biological therapy initiation, focusing on both spirometric and non-spirometric (oscillometry) measurements of the small airways to provide a comprehensive evaluation of respiratory function. <b>Results</b>: This study, conducted from July 2021 to March 2024, enrolled 40 patients with severe asthma, ultimately analyzing data from 31 participants who underwent biological therapy. The results showed significant improvements in asthma symptoms, the ACT scores increased significantly from visit 1 to visit 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.00008) and from visit 1 to visit 3 (<i>p</i> = 0.00047), and pulmonary function tests, with notable increases in FEV1 (from visit 1 (74.97 ± 23.43%) to visit 2 (82.96 ± 26.57%, <i>p</i> = 0.041) and to visit 3 (88.89 ± 31.41%, <i>p</i> = 0.003)) and quality of life scores, and substantial reductions in specific airway resistance and small airway dysfunction markers (the PEF, %pr post-BD showed significant improvement from visit 1 to visit 3 (<i>p</i> = 0.012)). However, oscillometric measurements showed no significant changes post-therapy. <b>Conclusions</b>: The study concluded that there was an improvement in the small airways measured by non-oscillometric values, without significant improvements in oscillometric parameters. Additionally, a significant improvement in symptoms was observed after the first month of therapy. There was also a significant increase in respiratory function after one to three months of therapy.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(19)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of Parma (IT), Policlinico Tor Vergata (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.