Linezolid Adsorption on Filters during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: An In Vitro Study

<b>Background:</b> Renal replacement therapy (RRT), widely used in the treatment of renal injury during sepsis, aims to eliminate the toxins and proinflammatory cytokines involved in the pathomechanism underlying septic shock. Dialysis filters are characterized by a high adsorption potential for cytokines in RRT in the case of septic renal injury. For the treatment of sepsis with antibiotics, it is of key importance to achieve the desired values of PK/PD indices. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may affect antimicrobial clearance, increasing their elimination in some cases. <b>Methods:</b> The aim of this study was to determine the degree of adsorption for linezolid on three different types of filters used in CRRT. In our in vitro study, a continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) was conducted using three types of filters: polysulfone (PS), polyethyleneimine-treated polyacrylonitrile (PAN PEI), and non-PEI-treated polyacrylonitrile (PAN). Each type of filter was used in three CVVH cycles, involving the use of 600 mg of linezolid dissolved in 700 mL of bovine blood or in 700 mL of 0.9% NaCl. In each case, the total volume of the obtained solution was 1000 mL. Blood samples were collected at particular time points to measure their drug concentration. The differences in mean drug/NaCl adsorption and drug/blood adsorption were determined using a one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons via Tukey's post hoc test; a <i>p</i>-value of <0.05 was considered significant. <b>Results</b>: A significant adsorption of linezolid was found for PAN PEI filters, both in samples obtained from bovine blood and 0.9% NaCl solutions, at the endpoint. In PAN PEI samples, the concentration of linezolid in 0.9% NaCl solutions decreased from 594.74 μg/mL to 310.66 μg/mL after 120 min (the difference was established at 52%). In blood samples, the initial concentration was 495.18 μg/mL, which then decreased to 359.84 μg/mL (73% of the beginning value). No significant adsorption was demonstrated on PAN or PS filters. <b>Conclusion:</b> There is a need for in vivo research to confirm the effect of filter type on linezolid concentration in patients undergoing CRRT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceuticals
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17101317
Primary Topic
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linezolid Adsorption on Filters during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: An In Vitro Study

Krzysztof Nosek, Dariusz Onichimowski, Michał Borys, Mirosław Czuczwar et al.
Pharmaceuticals
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
article

Linezolid Adsorption on Filters during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: An In Vitro Study

Krzysztof Nosek, Dariusz Onichimowski, Michał Borys, Mirosław Czuczwar, Hubert Ziółkowski, Paulina Markowska-Buńka, Milena Samiec
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Renal replacement therapy (RRT), widely used in the treatment of renal injury during sepsis, aims to eliminate the toxins and proinflammatory cytokines involved in the pathomechanism underlying septic shock. Dialysis filters are characterized by a high adsorption potential for cytokines in RRT in the case of septic renal injury. For the treatment of sepsis with antibiotics, it is of key importance to achieve the desired values of PK/PD indices. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may affect antimicrobial clearance, increasing their elimination in some cases. <b>Methods:</b> The aim of this study was to determine the degree of adsorption for linezolid on three different types of filters used in CRRT. In our in vitro study, a continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) was conducted using three types of filters: polysulfone (PS), polyethyleneimine-treated polyacrylonitrile (PAN PEI), and non-PEI-treated polyacrylonitrile (PAN). Each type of filter was used in three CVVH cycles, involving the use of 600 mg of linezolid dissolved in 700 mL of bovine blood or in 700 mL of 0.9% NaCl. In each case, the total volume of the obtained solution was 1000 mL. Blood samples were collected at particular time points to measure their drug concentration. The differences in mean drug/NaCl adsorption and drug/blood adsorption were determined using a one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons via Tukey's post hoc test; a <i>p</i>-value of <0.05 was considered significant. <b>Results</b>: A significant adsorption of linezolid was found for PAN PEI filters, both in samples obtained from bovine blood and 0.9% NaCl solutions, at the endpoint. In PAN PEI samples, the concentration of linezolid in 0.9% NaCl solutions decreased from 594.74 μg/mL to 310.66 μg/mL after 120 min (the difference was established at 52%). In blood samples, the initial concentration was 495.18 μg/mL, which then decreased to 359.84 μg/mL (73% of the beginning value). No significant adsorption was demonstrated on PAN or PS filters. <b>Conclusion:</b> There is a need for in vivo research to confirm the effect of filter type on linezolid concentration in patients undergoing CRRT.

PharmaceuticalsVol. 17(10)
Medical University of Lublin (PL), University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.