Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of Toll-Like Receptors 4 and 9 as Reliable Markers for Corona Virus Disease-19

Respiratory, multiorgan, and heart failure are the causes of mortality from COVID-19 so this pandemic has increased interest in the biochemical processes that explain the complex interactions between infectious pathogens and human hosts. The virus's entry activates the immune system, including various toll-like receptor (TLR) pathways that result in the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. This study aims to find meaningful COVID-19 biomarkers outside of conventional biochemical examinations. Patients and Methods: This study registered 100 people (n = 100), including 75 COVID-19 patients receiving care at the El Sahel Teaching Hospital and 25 healthy controls. We used RT-PCR, computed tomography (CT) scans, and biochemical routine profile tests like d-dimer, c-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) to confirm that the COVID-19 virus was real. We measured toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4) and toll-like receptor-9 (TLR-9) using the sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (sandwich ELISA) method. Results: The results showed that there were statically significant differences in WBC, HCT, neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, HbA1C, FBS, PPBS, and also COVID-19 profile biochemical tests except LDH. In the cases of TLR-4 and TLR-9, a significant difference appeared among the studied groups. We observed a highly significant correlation in the case of TLR-9 with ferritin and CRP. This study used ROC curves to measure the diagnostic accuracy of COVID-19. This study allowed for the accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 patients, with an AUC of 0.87 in the case of TLR-4 and 0.94 in the case of TLR-9. The ROC curve determined the cutoff points, and we measured the sensitivity and specificity of both TLR4 and TLR9 to be 80% and 79% for TLR-4, and 92% and 100% for TLR-9. Conclusion and Summary: TLR-4 and TLR-9 are effective biomarkers to distinguish between healthy and those with COVID-19 with acceptable sensitivity and specificity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences. C, Physiology and Molecular Biology/Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences. C, Physiology and Molecular Biology
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/eajbsc.2024.381914
Primary Topic
Influenza Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of Toll-Like Receptors 4 and 9 as Reliable Markers for Corona Virus Disease-19

Mohamed M. Omran, Amal Ahmed Mohamed, Asmaa Mohamed, Manar S. Foda et al.
Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences. C, Physiology and Molecular Biology/Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences. C, Physiology and Molecular Biology
Influenza Virus Research Studies
article

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of Toll-Like Receptors 4 and 9 as Reliable Markers for Corona Virus Disease-19

Mohamed M. Omran, Amal Ahmed Mohamed, Asmaa Mohamed, Manar S. Foda, Mona A. Abdulmohsen, Gehan H. Labib, Ahmed Y. Elamir, M. Arab
article en

Abstract

Respiratory, multiorgan, and heart failure are the causes of mortality from COVID-19 so this pandemic has increased interest in the biochemical processes that explain the complex interactions between infectious pathogens and human hosts. The virus's entry activates the immune system, including various toll-like receptor (TLR) pathways that result in the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. This study aims to find meaningful COVID-19 biomarkers outside of conventional biochemical examinations. Patients and Methods: This study registered 100 people (n = 100), including 75 COVID-19 patients receiving care at the El Sahel Teaching Hospital and 25 healthy controls. We used RT-PCR, computed tomography (CT) scans, and biochemical routine profile tests like d-dimer, c-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) to confirm that the COVID-19 virus was real. We measured toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4) and toll-like receptor-9 (TLR-9) using the sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (sandwich ELISA) method. Results: The results showed that there were statically significant differences in WBC, HCT, neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, HbA1C, FBS, PPBS, and also COVID-19 profile biochemical tests except LDH. In the cases of TLR-4 and TLR-9, a significant difference appeared among the studied groups. We observed a highly significant correlation in the case of TLR-9 with ferritin and CRP. This study used ROC curves to measure the diagnostic accuracy of COVID-19. This study allowed for the accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 patients, with an AUC of 0.87 in the case of TLR-4 and 0.94 in the case of TLR-9. The ROC curve determined the cutoff points, and we measured the sensitivity and specificity of both TLR4 and TLR9 to be 80% and 79% for TLR-4, and 92% and 100% for TLR-9. Conclusion and Summary: TLR-4 and TLR-9 are effective biomarkers to distinguish between healthy and those with COVID-19 with acceptable sensitivity and specificity.

Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences. C, Physiology and Molecular Biology/Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences. C, Physiology and Molecular BiologyVol. 16(2)
Cairo University (EG), University Teaching Hospital (ZM), Institute of Clinical Research (GB), National Water Research Center (EG), Helwan University (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Influenza Virus Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.