STRESS DISTRIPUTION OF IMPLANT RETAINED OBTURATORS USING TWO IMPLANT PLACEMENT CONFIGURATIONS FOR MAXILLECTOMY CASES: IN-VITRO STUDY

Introduction: Implant-retained obturators have several advantages over traditional obturators for maxillectomy patients. Appropriate prosthetic design for specific condition after maxillary resection is essential for improvement of retention, stability of implant retained obturator. Objectives: evaluation of peri-implant stress distribution of obturators retained by three implants placed with two different placement configurations.Material and methods: Three implants arranged in linear configuration and other three implants arranged in nonlinear configuration were inserted into two identical epoxy resin maxillary models of completely edentulous unilateral maxillary defect (Brown’s class IIA). Two equal sets of twenty-six obturators were constructed; each with different implant placement configuration. Group I include thirteen obturators retained by three implants with linear configuration while Group II include thirteen obturators retained by three implants with nonlinear configuration. Both groups included the same attachment design (non-splinted Ball attachment). Using strain gauges, the two groups' differences in strain distribution were measured and compared. Using the universal testing machine, bilateral applications of vertical load and oblique load (30o and 45o) of 50 and 100 N were applied in order to assess stress distribution around implants.Results: There was statistically significant difference in strain value between group I (linear configuration) and group II (nonlinear configuration) after application of 30o oblique loading at 50 N and 100 N with p value < 0.0001 as group II exhibited lower strain values.Conclusions: Implant placed with nonlinear configuration showed less strain values than implant placed with linear configuration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alexandria Dental Journal
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2024.247196.1440
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

STRESS DISTRIPUTION OF IMPLANT RETAINED OBTURATORS USING TWO IMPLANT PLACEMENT CONFIGURATIONS FOR MAXILLECTOMY CASES: IN-VITRO STUDY

Faten S. Mohamed, Sonia Morsy Elshabrawy, Nourhan Ibrahim Mahmoud Aboseada
Alexandria Dental Journal
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

STRESS DISTRIPUTION OF IMPLANT RETAINED OBTURATORS USING TWO IMPLANT PLACEMENT CONFIGURATIONS FOR MAXILLECTOMY CASES: IN-VITRO STUDY

Faten S. Mohamed, Sonia Morsy Elshabrawy, Nourhan Ibrahim Mahmoud Aboseada
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Implant-retained obturators have several advantages over traditional obturators for maxillectomy patients. Appropriate prosthetic design for specific condition after maxillary resection is essential for improvement of retention, stability of implant retained obturator. Objectives: evaluation of peri-implant stress distribution of obturators retained by three implants placed with two different placement configurations.Material and methods: Three implants arranged in linear configuration and other three implants arranged in nonlinear configuration were inserted into two identical epoxy resin maxillary models of completely edentulous unilateral maxillary defect (Brown’s class IIA). Two equal sets of twenty-six obturators were constructed; each with different implant placement configuration. Group I include thirteen obturators retained by three implants with linear configuration while Group II include thirteen obturators retained by three implants with nonlinear configuration. Both groups included the same attachment design (non-splinted Ball attachment). Using strain gauges, the two groups' differences in strain distribution were measured and compared. Using the universal testing machine, bilateral applications of vertical load and oblique load (30o and 45o) of 50 and 100 N were applied in order to assess stress distribution around implants.Results: There was statistically significant difference in strain value between group I (linear configuration) and group II (nonlinear configuration) after application of 30o oblique loading at 50 N and 100 N with p value < 0.0001 as group II exhibited lower strain values.Conclusions: Implant placed with nonlinear configuration showed less strain values than implant placed with linear configuration.

Alexandria Dental JournalVol. 50(1)
Alexandria University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.