Response of white-tailed deer to removal of invasive wild pigs

Context With the range expansion of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in North America during the past decades, there has been an increasing concern with how wild pigs affect native species. An abundance of research on their impacts has been through the lens of damage to anthropogenic resources and plant communities. However, quantitative research on how wild pigs affect populations of native animal species is an understudied topic. Aims Our goal was to assess how wild pigs affect white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) at a population level by measuring changes in deer abundance as wild pigs are removed. White-tailed deer are an economically valuable game species in North America, and negative impacts of wild pigs on their populations could have trickle-down impacts on conservation funding for all wildlife. Methods On three treatment areas (34.07–55.31 km2) and one control area (25.10 km2), we used N-mixture models to compare data from camera-trap surveys of white-tailed deer before and after wild pigs were removed from treatment areas. Key results We removed 1851 pigs from the treatment sites between May 2019 and March 2021. We found that wild pigs did not significantly affect white-tailed deer abundance, but that white-tailed deer were 1.12 (1.02–1.23; 95% CL) times as likely to be detected when the number of pigs removed was equal to our baseline population estimates compared with when no pigs were removed. Although results from similar analyses on separate age and sex classes of white-tailed deer exhibited similar results, analyses of impacts on immature males differed. Conclusions Our overall results are congruent with those of other research that suggest that wild pigs affect white-tailed deer behaviour at a local scale, although eliminating pigs from an area does not appear to quickly lead to increased abundance of deer. Implications Although the interspecific interactions between white-tailed deer and wild pigs are unlikely to lead to a decline in the population of white-tailed deer, removing wild pigs may decrease the behavioural implications of these interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Research
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/wr23097
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response of white-tailed deer to removal of invasive wild pigs

Matthew T. McDonough, Stephen S. Ditchkoff, Robert A. Gitzen, Kurt C. VerCauteren et al.
3 citations
Wildlife Research
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.38
article

Response of white-tailed deer to removal of invasive wild pigs

Matthew T. McDonough, Stephen S. Ditchkoff, Robert A. Gitzen, Kurt C. VerCauteren, Stephen J. Zenas, Mark D. Smith
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Context With the range expansion of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in North America during the past decades, there has been an increasing concern with how wild pigs affect native species. An abundance of research on their impacts has been through the lens of damage to anthropogenic resources and plant communities. However, quantitative research on how wild pigs affect populations of native animal species is an understudied topic. Aims Our goal was to assess how wild pigs affect white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) at a population level by measuring changes in deer abundance as wild pigs are removed. White-tailed deer are an economically valuable game species in North America, and negative impacts of wild pigs on their populations could have trickle-down impacts on conservation funding for all wildlife. Methods On three treatment areas (34.07–55.31 km2) and one control area (25.10 km2), we used N-mixture models to compare data from camera-trap surveys of white-tailed deer before and after wild pigs were removed from treatment areas. Key results We removed 1851 pigs from the treatment sites between May 2019 and March 2021. We found that wild pigs did not significantly affect white-tailed deer abundance, but that white-tailed deer were 1.12 (1.02–1.23; 95% CL) times as likely to be detected when the number of pigs removed was equal to our baseline population estimates compared with when no pigs were removed. Although results from similar analyses on separate age and sex classes of white-tailed deer exhibited similar results, analyses of impacts on immature males differed. Conclusions Our overall results are congruent with those of other research that suggest that wild pigs affect white-tailed deer behaviour at a local scale, although eliminating pigs from an area does not appear to quickly lead to increased abundance of deer. Implications Although the interspecific interactions between white-tailed deer and wild pigs are unlikely to lead to a decline in the population of white-tailed deer, removing wild pigs may decrease the behavioural implications of these interactions.

Wildlife ResearchVol. 51(10)
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (US), Auburn University (US)
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.