When does criminal victimization undermine generalized trust? A weighted panel analysis of the effects of crime type, frequency, and variety

Scholars from various fields have suggested that criminal victimization can shatter generalized trust. Whereas small average effects in longitudinal studies provide only weak support for this claim, victimization effects may be stronger for specific crime types and multiple victimization. To test this assumption, we estimated various victimization effects by combining Energy weighting with lagged dependent variable models, using data from two-wave panel surveys conducted in 2014/2015 (cohort 1; N = 3401) and 2020/2021 (cohort 2; N = 2932) in two German cities. We found weak evidence that trust-undermining effects of victimization were more pronounced for severe crime types or multiple victimization. Effects were only stronger for violent crimes and some forms of multiple victimization in 2014/2015 but not in 2020/2021. Besides, our weighting procedure implies that our (and probably others') findings for more intense victimization conditions must be viewed with caution, as they suffer from lower internal validity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Research
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103086
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When does criminal victimization undermine generalized trust? A weighted panel analysis of the effects of crime type, frequency, and variety

Noah Greifer, Kristian Kleinke, Isabel Thielmann, Dietrich Oberwittler et al.
Social Science Research
Crime Patterns and Interventions
article

When does criminal victimization undermine generalized trust? A weighted panel analysis of the effects of crime type, frequency, and variety

Noah Greifer, Kristian Kleinke, Isabel Thielmann, Dietrich Oberwittler, Florian Kaiser
article en

Abstract

Scholars from various fields have suggested that criminal victimization can shatter generalized trust. Whereas small average effects in longitudinal studies provide only weak support for this claim, victimization effects may be stronger for specific crime types and multiple victimization. To test this assumption, we estimated various victimization effects by combining Energy weighting with lagged dependent variable models, using data from two-wave panel surveys conducted in 2014/2015 (cohort 1; N = 3401) and 2020/2021 (cohort 2; N = 2932) in two German cities. We found weak evidence that trust-undermining effects of victimization were more pronounced for severe crime types or multiple victimization. Effects were only stronger for violent crimes and some forms of multiple victimization in 2014/2015 but not in 2020/2021. Besides, our weighting procedure implies that our (and probably others') findings for more intense victimization conditions must be viewed with caution, as they suffer from lower internal validity.

Social Science ResearchVol. 124
Harvard University (US), University of Siegen (DE), Quantitative BioSciences (US), Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When does criminal victimization undermine generalized trust? A weighted panel analysis of the effects of crime type, frequency, and variety — Noah Greifer, Kristian Kleinke, et al. · Social Science Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS