Item Bank Development and Content Validation of a Youth Sport Specialization Assessment

OBJECTIVE: To refine and evaluate the content validity of a bank of items representing the physical, social, and motivation behaviors associated with youth sport specialization. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis. METHODS: The conceptual framework for item generation involved an existing consensus-based definition of youth sport specialization. Purposive sampling recruited English-literate youth athletes who participated in at least 1 organized sport in the past 12 months to participate in individual cognitive interviews. Three rounds of interviews used a “read aloud, think aloud” strategy to evaluate the comprehension, relevance, and comprehensiveness of the items and their response structure. One reviewer conducted thematic analysis of verbatim transcripts following rounds 1 to 2; after round 3, 2 independent reviewers evaluated the content validity of all items. The full research team reviewed results and established consensus regarding item acceptance, revision, or removal. RESULTS: Twenty-two participants (64% male, 13.8±3.0 years) were interviewed. Participants were classified as low (59%), moderate (23%), and high (18%) specialization. Thirty-one items organized into participation volume, physical, motivation, and social domains were tested. Comprehension of 24 items in the physical (n = 6), motivation (n = 12), and social (n = 6) domains was acceptable. No participation volume items achieved content validity. Acceptable items were considered relevant to youth sport specialization, and the item bank was deemed comprehensive. Participants affirmed the response structure was easy to understand and use. CONCLUSION: Content validity was established for a bank of patient-reported items assessing youth sport specialization. An appropriate next step is to conduct psychometric evaluation and develop a youth sport specialization assessment. JOSPT Open 2025;3(1):22-29. Epub 02 October 2024. doi:10.2519/josptopen.2024.0065

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JOSPT open.
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2519/josptopen.2024.0065
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Item Bank Development and Content Validation of a Youth Sport Specialization Assessment

M. Alison Brooks, Timothy A. McGuine, Kevin M. Biese, Traci R. Snedden et al.
1 citations
JOSPT open.
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
0.54
article

Item Bank Development and Content Validation of a Youth Sport Specialization Assessment

M. Alison Brooks, Timothy A. McGuine, Kevin M. Biese, Traci R. Snedden, Andrew Watson, Stephanie Kliethermes‌, Madison N. Renner, Evan O. Nelson, Emily C. Srygler, David R. Bell
article en
1 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To refine and evaluate the content validity of a bank of items representing the physical, social, and motivation behaviors associated with youth sport specialization. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis. METHODS: The conceptual framework for item generation involved an existing consensus-based definition of youth sport specialization. Purposive sampling recruited English-literate youth athletes who participated in at least 1 organized sport in the past 12 months to participate in individual cognitive interviews. Three rounds of interviews used a “read aloud, think aloud” strategy to evaluate the comprehension, relevance, and comprehensiveness of the items and their response structure. One reviewer conducted thematic analysis of verbatim transcripts following rounds 1 to 2; after round 3, 2 independent reviewers evaluated the content validity of all items. The full research team reviewed results and established consensus regarding item acceptance, revision, or removal. RESULTS: Twenty-two participants (64% male, 13.8±3.0 years) were interviewed. Participants were classified as low (59%), moderate (23%), and high (18%) specialization. Thirty-one items organized into participation volume, physical, motivation, and social domains were tested. Comprehension of 24 items in the physical (n = 6), motivation (n = 12), and social (n = 6) domains was acceptable. No participation volume items achieved content validity. Acceptable items were considered relevant to youth sport specialization, and the item bank was deemed comprehensive. Participants affirmed the response structure was easy to understand and use. CONCLUSION: Content validity was established for a bank of patient-reported items assessing youth sport specialization. An appropriate next step is to conduct psychometric evaluation and develop a youth sport specialization assessment. JOSPT Open 2025;3(1):22-29. Epub 02 October 2024. doi:10.2519/josptopen.2024.0065

JOSPT open.Vol. 3(1)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.