Current Status and Prospects of Robotic Pancreatic Surgery

Introduction Over the past two decades, the application of robotic surgery (RS) in pancreatic surgery has steadily increased. RS offers advantages such as reduced blood loss, less postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stays. However, there is still no consensus on its safety, efficacy, and learning curve in pancreatic diseases. This study aims to summarize the current state of RS in pancreatic surgery and to forecast its prospects. Method A literature search was conducted in PubMed using keywords including “robotic surgery”, “pancreatic surgery”, “minimally invasive surgery”, “open surgery” and “laparoscopic surgery”. Studies on robotic surgery in pancreatic surgery were collected, including research comparing robotic surgery with open or laparoscopic surgery. Results RS has been applied to various pancreatic surgeries, demonstrating good safety and feasibility. Compared to open or laparoscopic surgery, robotic pancreatic surgery (RPS) shows favorable short-term outcomes such as reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and lower conversion rates, especially in surgeries with narrow operative spaces or complex anatomical structures. No significant differences were reported in postoperative complications or short-term mortality rates. RPS achieves comparable R0 resection rates, lymph node harvest numbers, and long-term outcomes. However, RPS also presents limitations, including a long learning curve, high surgical costs, a lack of dedicated instruments, and the absence of natural tactile feedback. Conclusion Robotic pancreatic surgery demonstrates favorable short-term and long-term outcomes, showing promising potential for application. Further multi-center randomized controlled trials are needed to determine its safety and efficacy conclusively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Impact Surgery
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62463/surgery.86
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current Status and Prospects of Robotic Pancreatic Surgery

Xiaodong Tian, Yingchao Wu, Lu Ye, Yongsu Ma et al.
Impact Surgery
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Current Status and Prospects of Robotic Pancreatic Surgery

Xiaodong Tian, Yingchao Wu, Lu Ye, Yongsu Ma, Yiran Chen, Jinli Yu, Yuxin Wang
article en

Abstract

Introduction Over the past two decades, the application of robotic surgery (RS) in pancreatic surgery has steadily increased. RS offers advantages such as reduced blood loss, less postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stays. However, there is still no consensus on its safety, efficacy, and learning curve in pancreatic diseases. This study aims to summarize the current state of RS in pancreatic surgery and to forecast its prospects. Method A literature search was conducted in PubMed using keywords including “robotic surgery”, “pancreatic surgery”, “minimally invasive surgery”, “open surgery” and “laparoscopic surgery”. Studies on robotic surgery in pancreatic surgery were collected, including research comparing robotic surgery with open or laparoscopic surgery. Results RS has been applied to various pancreatic surgeries, demonstrating good safety and feasibility. Compared to open or laparoscopic surgery, robotic pancreatic surgery (RPS) shows favorable short-term outcomes such as reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and lower conversion rates, especially in surgeries with narrow operative spaces or complex anatomical structures. No significant differences were reported in postoperative complications or short-term mortality rates. RPS achieves comparable R0 resection rates, lymph node harvest numbers, and long-term outcomes. However, RPS also presents limitations, including a long learning curve, high surgical costs, a lack of dedicated instruments, and the absence of natural tactile feedback. Conclusion Robotic pancreatic surgery demonstrates favorable short-term and long-term outcomes, showing promising potential for application. Further multi-center randomized controlled trials are needed to determine its safety and efficacy conclusively.

Impact SurgeryVol. 1(5)
Peking University (CN), Shenyang Anorectal Hospital (CN), Peking University First Hospital (CN)
Peking University First Hospital, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Peking University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.