Recovery and Recidivism: The Aftermath of Helping the Organization Unethically
Abstract This research draws from moral self-regulation and moral disengagement theories to examine how employees react to their own unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB). We hypothesize that UPB will elicit mixed moral-based cognitive responses among employees that promote both recovery and recidivism. Results of two studies show that, on the one hand, engaging in UPB damaged perpetrators' moral self-concept, captured by an increase in perceived loss of moral credits; this prompted them to perform customer-directed helping behaviors to recover their damaged moral self-concept; on the other hand, UPB also elicited a cognitive justification process, which was related to an increase in subsequent UPB. This nuanced reaction helps explain why individuals' moral self-regulation does not necessarily remedy for moral failings, while also suggesting practical steps that leaders can take to prevent a "slippery slope" pattern of UPB from taking hold in the organization.
Authors
- Tyler G. Okimoto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4506-6826)
- Hongmin Yan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1238-8490)
- David Solnet (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2250-5520)
Institutions
- Griffith University (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Business and Psychology
- Published
- 2024-10-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09988-x
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Ethics in Business and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.10
Funders
- Griffith University