Prediction of Chemical Looping Hydrogen Production Using Physics-Informed Machine Learning

Hydrogen energy holds promise for controlling emissions but is limited by the production cost and method. Chemical looping hydrogen production (CLHP) provides a more efficient and environmentally sustainable route to produce high-purity hydrogen compared with conventional methods. Yet, CLHP involves a series of operational variables, and the optimization of operating conditions is the critical issue for large-scale hydrogen production. In this study, support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and physics-informed neural network (PINN) models are developed to predict hydrogen production rates by analyzing multiple process variables. Through the analysis of the database and experiments, we integrated physical consistency as prior physical knowledge into the PINN for eliminating the data dependence. All models are optimized for optimal performance through hyperparameters. The comparison of five machine learning models reveals that DT and RF models exhibit a characteristic step-like pattern in their predictions, while SVM and ANN models produce outputs that often diverge from the expected trend. The prediction of the PINN model exhibits good performance with R2, mean squared error, and mean absolute percentage error scores of 0.882, 1.228, and 18.1%, respectively. The results are with high interpretability due to the physical-informed inherent feature. Then, the CLHP process is studied, and the relationships between hydrogen yield and operating temperature, gas flow rate, and mass fraction of iron oxide are established. This work shows the difference in the prediction curves between the different models. By training various general models and comparing their predictive performance on chemical looping data, we can gain valuable insights to guide subsequent predictions for CLHP. It will be beneficial for the design of oxygen carriers and the optimization of the CLHP process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02988
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of Chemical Looping Hydrogen Production Using Physics-Informed Machine Learning

Rui Xiao, Ran Zhang, Fan Yin, Zixiang Gao et al.
8 citations
Energy & Fuels
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
1.48
article

Prediction of Chemical Looping Hydrogen Production Using Physics-Informed Machine Learning

Rui Xiao, Ran Zhang, Fan Yin, Zixiang Gao, Liyan Sun, Jialei Cao
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Hydrogen energy holds promise for controlling emissions but is limited by the production cost and method. Chemical looping hydrogen production (CLHP) provides a more efficient and environmentally sustainable route to produce high-purity hydrogen compared with conventional methods. Yet, CLHP involves a series of operational variables, and the optimization of operating conditions is the critical issue for large-scale hydrogen production. In this study, support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and physics-informed neural network (PINN) models are developed to predict hydrogen production rates by analyzing multiple process variables. Through the analysis of the database and experiments, we integrated physical consistency as prior physical knowledge into the PINN for eliminating the data dependence. All models are optimized for optimal performance through hyperparameters. The comparison of five machine learning models reveals that DT and RF models exhibit a characteristic step-like pattern in their predictions, while SVM and ANN models produce outputs that often diverge from the expected trend. The prediction of the PINN model exhibits good performance with R2, mean squared error, and mean absolute percentage error scores of 0.882, 1.228, and 18.1%, respectively. The results are with high interpretability due to the physical-informed inherent feature. Then, the CLHP process is studied, and the relationships between hydrogen yield and operating temperature, gas flow rate, and mass fraction of iron oxide are established. This work shows the difference in the prediction curves between the different models. By training various general models and comparing their predictive performance on chemical looping data, we can gain valuable insights to guide subsequent predictions for CLHP. It will be beneficial for the design of oxygen carriers and the optimization of the CLHP process.

Energy & FuelsVol. 38(20)
Southeast University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
1.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.