Identification of Pipeline Intrusion Signals Based on ICEEMDAN-FE-AIT and F-ELM in the uwDAS System

Aiming at the problem of low signal identification accuracy due to various noises in pipeline intrusion signals collected by the ultraweak fiber grating distributed acoustic sensors (uwDAS) system, we propose an identification method on top of a new denoising approach for pipeline intrusion signals in this article. The denoising approach uses improved complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise, fuzzy entropy, and adaptive interval thresholding (ICEEMDAN-FE-AIT). The fisher score feature selection and extreme learning machine (F-ELM) are combined to identify the intrusion signals. We build a data acquisition platform in the laboratory to collect the pipeline intrusion signals, including chainsaw, mechanical vibration, excavator digging, artificial digging, and no-intrusion. Experiments show that the ratio of noise signal to noise reduction (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${R}_{\text {DNSN}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) of ICEEMDAN-FE-AIT is better than those of four other denoising methods, namely, variational mode decomposition and permutation entropy (VMD-PE) method; the ICEEMDAN-PE-AIT method; the ICEEMDAN, energy density and average periodicity, and AIT (ICEEMDAN-ET-AIT) method; and the ICEEMDAN-FE and wavelet soft threshold denoising (ICEEMDAN-FE-WSTD) method. The values of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${R}_{\text {DNSN}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> for the five signals are 15.2043, 16.7654, 14.9815, 15.5541, and 13.5428 dB, respectively. The average identification accuracy is 93.27%, in subsequent identification experiments using F-ELM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Sensors Journal
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2024.3468878
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Image and Signal Denoising Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of Pipeline Intrusion Signals Based on ICEEMDAN-FE-AIT and F-ELM in the uwDAS System

Changyan Ran, Xiaoan Chen, Zhihui Luo, Peijun Xiao
3 citations
IEEE Sensors Journal
Image and Signal Denoising Methods
0.75
article

Identification of Pipeline Intrusion Signals Based on ICEEMDAN-FE-AIT and F-ELM in the uwDAS System

Changyan Ran, Xiaoan Chen, Zhihui Luo, Peijun Xiao
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Aiming at the problem of low signal identification accuracy due to various noises in pipeline intrusion signals collected by the ultraweak fiber grating distributed acoustic sensors (uwDAS) system, we propose an identification method on top of a new denoising approach for pipeline intrusion signals in this article. The denoising approach uses improved complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise, fuzzy entropy, and adaptive interval thresholding (ICEEMDAN-FE-AIT). The fisher score feature selection and extreme learning machine (F-ELM) are combined to identify the intrusion signals. We build a data acquisition platform in the laboratory to collect the pipeline intrusion signals, including chainsaw, mechanical vibration, excavator digging, artificial digging, and no-intrusion. Experiments show that the ratio of noise signal to noise reduction (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${R}_{\text {DNSN}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) of ICEEMDAN-FE-AIT is better than those of four other denoising methods, namely, variational mode decomposition and permutation entropy (VMD-PE) method; the ICEEMDAN-PE-AIT method; the ICEEMDAN, energy density and average periodicity, and AIT (ICEEMDAN-ET-AIT) method; and the ICEEMDAN-FE and wavelet soft threshold denoising (ICEEMDAN-FE-WSTD) method. The values of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${R}_{\text {DNSN}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> for the five signals are 15.2043, 16.7654, 14.9815, 15.5541, and 13.5428 dB, respectively. The average identification accuracy is 93.27%, in subsequent identification experiments using F-ELM.

IEEE Sensors JournalVol. 24(22)
China Three Gorges University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Image and Signal Denoising Methods
0.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.