Removal of iron and aluminum from hydrometallurgical NMC-LFP recycling process through precipitation

• The presence of LFP in battery waste changes Fe and Al removal. • At pH 2 iron can be precipitated with 0.7 wt% Ni and ≤ 0.4 wt% Mn, Co, Al, and Li. • Iron precipitates as iron phosphate (FePO 4 ) and iron fluoride (FeF 3 ) • 91% of Al precipitates at pH 4.5 as AlOOH, Al-F complex keeps minor Al soluble. • Selective Fe removal or combined Fe-Al removal can be conducted with pH adjustment. There is a need to develop removal strategies for typical battery impurities–iron and aluminum–from actual hydrometallurgical recycling solutions. In this work, the investigated solution originated from lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) rich black mass, while iron phosphate (LFP) was used as an in situ reductant. It was found that the presence of phosphate ions supported selective iron precipitation already at pH = 2.0 ( T = 60 °C, t = 3 h, NaOH), with nearly complete iron removal (97.8 %). The precipitate was rich in iron (21.5 wt%) and phosphorus (13.4 wt%); it also contained 0.7 wt% Ni and 0.3–0.4 wt% Mn, Co, Al, and Li. It is suggested that the presence of phosphate in minor amounts may cause this co-precipitation of battery metals. With the aim of combined precipitation of iron (100 %) and aluminum (91.0 %), the pH was increased up to 4.5. Although 90.8 % of fluoride precipitated, the remaining fluorides may have kept the aluminum partially in soluble form as Al-F complexes. The formed precipitate had lower iron (18.4 wt%) and phosphorus (11.4 wt%) content, whereas the impurity contents and thus the battery metals losses were slightly higher: Ni, Mn, Co, Al, and Cu were each between 1.1–1.9 wt% and Li and F < 1 wt%. In the precipitates investigated, iron was found predominantly as iron phosphate (FePO 4 ), whereas a minor fraction also precipitated as iron fluoride (FeF 3 ). The precipitated aluminum existed mainly as AlOOH. The results presented here will help to build iron and aluminum removal strategies for industrial battery recycling solutions, and also provide insights into the dominant iron and aluminum phases forming the precipitates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerals Engineering
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2024.109037
Citations
24
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Removal of iron and aluminum from hydrometallurgical NMC-LFP recycling process through precipitation

Mari Lundström, Yuanmin Zou, A. P. Chernyaev, Sipi Seisko et al.
24 citations
Minerals Engineering
Extraction and Separation Processes
5.10
article

Removal of iron and aluminum from hydrometallurgical NMC-LFP recycling process through precipitation

Mari Lundström, Yuanmin Zou, A. P. Chernyaev, Sipi Seisko, Jani Sainio
article en
24 citations

Abstract

• The presence of LFP in battery waste changes Fe and Al removal. • At pH 2 iron can be precipitated with 0.7 wt% Ni and ≤ 0.4 wt% Mn, Co, Al, and Li. • Iron precipitates as iron phosphate (FePO 4 ) and iron fluoride (FeF 3 ) • 91% of Al precipitates at pH 4.5 as AlOOH, Al-F complex keeps minor Al soluble. • Selective Fe removal or combined Fe-Al removal can be conducted with pH adjustment. There is a need to develop removal strategies for typical battery impurities–iron and aluminum–from actual hydrometallurgical recycling solutions. In this work, the investigated solution originated from lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) rich black mass, while iron phosphate (LFP) was used as an in situ reductant. It was found that the presence of phosphate ions supported selective iron precipitation already at pH = 2.0 ( T = 60 °C, t = 3 h, NaOH), with nearly complete iron removal (97.8 %). The precipitate was rich in iron (21.5 wt%) and phosphorus (13.4 wt%); it also contained 0.7 wt% Ni and 0.3–0.4 wt% Mn, Co, Al, and Li. It is suggested that the presence of phosphate in minor amounts may cause this co-precipitation of battery metals. With the aim of combined precipitation of iron (100 %) and aluminum (91.0 %), the pH was increased up to 4.5. Although 90.8 % of fluoride precipitated, the remaining fluorides may have kept the aluminum partially in soluble form as Al-F complexes. The formed precipitate had lower iron (18.4 wt%) and phosphorus (11.4 wt%) content, whereas the impurity contents and thus the battery metals losses were slightly higher: Ni, Mn, Co, Al, and Cu were each between 1.1–1.9 wt% and Li and F < 1 wt%. In the precipitates investigated, iron was found predominantly as iron phosphate (FePO 4 ), whereas a minor fraction also precipitated as iron fluoride (FeF 3 ). The precipitated aluminum existed mainly as AlOOH. The results presented here will help to build iron and aluminum removal strategies for industrial battery recycling solutions, and also provide insights into the dominant iron and aluminum phases forming the precipitates.

Minerals EngineeringVol. 218
Outotec (Finland) (FI), Aalto University (FI)
Academy of Finland, Business Finland
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Extraction and Separation Processes
5.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.