Inevitable challenges of autonomy: ethical concerns in personalized algorithmic decision-making

Breakthroughs in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have transformed human decision-making processes. Individuals increasingly rely on algorithms to assist with various tasks such as searching and shopping. However, the widespread use of personalized algorithmic decision-making has raised numerous ethical concerns, specifically its impact on user autonomy. This article examines these concerns and argues that algorithmic decision-making presents several challenges to user autonomy that are difficult to eliminate. These challenges include the fact that algorithms deviate from a user’s authentic self, create self-reinforcing loops that narrow the user’s self, and lead to a decline in the user’s capacities. This article attributes these challenges to the ontological differences between users and AI, as well as their unawareness regarding the ethical risks associated with algorithms, asserting that the sense of autonomy users experience in algorithmic decision-making is merely an illusion. From the perspective of human-AI interaction, it is proposed a strategy that achieves a balance between human insight and AI through a human-in-the-loop approach to mitigate these challenges. This approach maximizes the strengths of AI in processing and analyzing data while ensuring that users retain agency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2024-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03864-y
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inevitable challenges of autonomy: ethical concerns in personalized algorithmic decision-making

Wencheng Lu
17 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
8.94
article

Inevitable challenges of autonomy: ethical concerns in personalized algorithmic decision-making

Wencheng Lu
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Breakthroughs in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have transformed human decision-making processes. Individuals increasingly rely on algorithms to assist with various tasks such as searching and shopping. However, the widespread use of personalized algorithmic decision-making has raised numerous ethical concerns, specifically its impact on user autonomy. This article examines these concerns and argues that algorithmic decision-making presents several challenges to user autonomy that are difficult to eliminate. These challenges include the fact that algorithms deviate from a user’s authentic self, create self-reinforcing loops that narrow the user’s self, and lead to a decline in the user’s capacities. This article attributes these challenges to the ontological differences between users and AI, as well as their unawareness regarding the ethical risks associated with algorithms, asserting that the sense of autonomy users experience in algorithmic decision-making is merely an illusion. From the perspective of human-AI interaction, it is proposed a strategy that achieves a balance between human insight and AI through a human-in-the-loop approach to mitigate these challenges. This approach maximizes the strengths of AI in processing and analyzing data while ensuring that users retain agency.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 11(1)
Southeast University (CN)
Southeast University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
8.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.