Development and Evaluation of the OF Pelvis Score for Osteoporotic Pelvic Ring Fractures – A Retrospective Assessment of Therapy Recommendations for 107 Patients

The aim of this study was to develop a simple and reliable score which supports decision making between non-operative and operative treatment in patients with osteoporotic pelvic fractures.Between 2018 to 2020, the OF Pelvis Score was developed during a total of 5 meetings of the Working Group on Osteoporotic Fractures of the Spine Section of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma. The OF Pelvis Score as a decision aid between non-surgical and surgical treatment was developed by expert consensus after analysis of numerous geriatric sacral and pelvic ring fractures from several hospitals. Subsequently, retrospective evaluation of the score was performed on consecutive patients from three hospitals.The following parameters were considered relevant to decision making between non-surgical and surgical treatment and were incorporated into the score: fracture morphology using the OF Pelvis Classification, pain status, level of mobilisation, fracture-related neurological deficits, health status, and the modifiers already integrated into the OF Pelvis classification. If the score is < 8, non-surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is > 8, surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is 8, there is a relative indication for surgery. The OF Pelvis Score was then evaluated retrospectively in a total of 107 patients, according to records. The OF Pelvis Score was 8 points in 4 patients (3.7%), all of whom received surgical treatment. Of the remaining 103 patients, 93 received score-compliant therapy (90.3%). Among these, 4 of the patients who did not receive score-compliant care refused the recommended surgery, so the actual therapy recommendation was score-compliant in 94.2%.The OF Pelvis Score can be used to derive a therapy recommendation in many patients in clinical practice. Because of the possible change of clinical parameters during the course of the disease, the score has a dynamic character. In the retrospective evaluation, the recommendations from the OF Pelvis Score were in close accordance with the therapy actually performed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2385-1747
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Evaluation of the OF Pelvis Score for Osteoporotic Pelvic Ring Fractures – A Retrospective Assessment of Therapy Recommendations for 107 Patients

Lars Behr, Max J. Scheyerer, Kai Sprengel, Michael Müller et al.
2 citations
Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
1.15
article

Development and Evaluation of the OF Pelvis Score for Osteoporotic Pelvic Ring Fractures – A Retrospective Assessment of Therapy Recommendations for 107 Patients

Lars Behr, Max J. Scheyerer, Kai Sprengel, Michael Müller, Georg Osterhoff, Philipp Hartung, Stefan Piltz, Martin Bäumlein, Erol Gercek, Thomas Mendel, Friederike Klauke, Christian Müller, S. Katscher, Gregor Schmeiser, Ulrich Spiegl, Klaus John Schnake, Robert Pätzold, Bernhard Ullrich, Marion Riehle, S. Grüninger, Katja Liepold, Stefan Hauck, Cornelius Jacobs, Volker Zimmermann, Alexander Franck, A.P. Verheyden
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a simple and reliable score which supports decision making between non-operative and operative treatment in patients with osteoporotic pelvic fractures.Between 2018 to 2020, the OF Pelvis Score was developed during a total of 5 meetings of the Working Group on Osteoporotic Fractures of the Spine Section of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma. The OF Pelvis Score as a decision aid between non-surgical and surgical treatment was developed by expert consensus after analysis of numerous geriatric sacral and pelvic ring fractures from several hospitals. Subsequently, retrospective evaluation of the score was performed on consecutive patients from three hospitals.The following parameters were considered relevant to decision making between non-surgical and surgical treatment and were incorporated into the score: fracture morphology using the OF Pelvis Classification, pain status, level of mobilisation, fracture-related neurological deficits, health status, and the modifiers already integrated into the OF Pelvis classification. If the score is < 8, non-surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is > 8, surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is 8, there is a relative indication for surgery. The OF Pelvis Score was then evaluated retrospectively in a total of 107 patients, according to records. The OF Pelvis Score was 8 points in 4 patients (3.7%), all of whom received surgical treatment. Of the remaining 103 patients, 93 received score-compliant therapy (90.3%). Among these, 4 of the patients who did not receive score-compliant care refused the recommended surgery, so the actual therapy recommendation was score-compliant in 94.2%.The OF Pelvis Score can be used to derive a therapy recommendation in many patients in clinical practice. Because of the possible change of clinical parameters during the course of the disease, the score has a dynamic character. In the retrospective evaluation, the recommendations from the OF Pelvis Score were in close accordance with the therapy actually performed.

Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und UnfallchirurgieVol. 163(03)
Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University Hospital Bonn (DE), Asklepios Fachklinikum Brandenburg (DE), Ortenau Klinikum (DE), Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie (DE), Nuremberg Hospital (DE), Schön Klinik Hamburg Eilbek (DE), Alb Fils Kliniken (DE), St. Josefs Hospital (DE), Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Murnau (DE), Malteser Waldkrankenhaus Erlangen (DE), Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität (DE), University Hospital Leipzig (DE), Technische Hochschule Georg Agricola (DE), München Klinik Harlaching (DE), Klinikum Coburg (DE), Hirslanden Klinik St. Anna (CH), Sana Kliniken Leipziger Land (DE), BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.