Evaluation of chlorine dioxide exposure in an Australian gnotobiotic mouse research facility

Exposure to chlorine dioxide by staff working in a gnotobiotic mouse facility at an Australian research institute was measured to determine whether current controls were sufficient to ensure their exposure remains below the current Australian workplace exposure standard. A combination of workplace surveys, interviews with workers, and personal sampling was undertaken to understand the workplace, identify higher-risk tasks, and measure the concentration of chlorine dioxide in the air where the workers conduct routine tasks involving the use of a chlorine dioxide-based disinfectant. Personal sampling utilized the validated Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) method ID-202, with minor alterations. The tasks identified as being associated with higher airborne exposure to chlorine dioxide were the use of an atomizer to fill isolator ports with aerosolized disinfectant and the use of a disinfectant dunk tank to submerge and surface decontaminate objects. The current work practices in the gnotobiotic facility were found to be compliant with the current 8-hr time-weighted average (TWA) limit of 0.1 ppm (0.28 mg/m<sup>3</sup>) but were not compliant with the 15-min short-term exposure limit (STEL) of 0.3 ppm (0.83 mg/m<sup>3</sup>). Improvements in exposure controls, such as implementing the use of a fume cupboard (hood) or other local ventilation when activating the disinfectant solution and improving the utilization of respiratory protective equipment, are therefore required to meet the STEL, but it is recommended that such improvements are also aimed at meeting the proposed Peak limitation of 0.1 ppm that is expected to soon be adopted by Safe Work Australia, replacing the current TWA-8hr and STEL exposure standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2024.2394102
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of chlorine dioxide exposure in an Australian gnotobiotic mouse research facility

Kelly Johnstone, Peter McGarry, Donna M. Easton
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Animal testing and alternatives
article

Evaluation of chlorine dioxide exposure in an Australian gnotobiotic mouse research facility

Kelly Johnstone, Peter McGarry, Donna M. Easton
article en

Abstract

Exposure to chlorine dioxide by staff working in a gnotobiotic mouse facility at an Australian research institute was measured to determine whether current controls were sufficient to ensure their exposure remains below the current Australian workplace exposure standard. A combination of workplace surveys, interviews with workers, and personal sampling was undertaken to understand the workplace, identify higher-risk tasks, and measure the concentration of chlorine dioxide in the air where the workers conduct routine tasks involving the use of a chlorine dioxide-based disinfectant. Personal sampling utilized the validated Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) method ID-202, with minor alterations. The tasks identified as being associated with higher airborne exposure to chlorine dioxide were the use of an atomizer to fill isolator ports with aerosolized disinfectant and the use of a disinfectant dunk tank to submerge and surface decontaminate objects. The current work practices in the gnotobiotic facility were found to be compliant with the current 8-hr time-weighted average (TWA) limit of 0.1 ppm (0.28 mg/m<sup>3</sup>) but were not compliant with the 15-min short-term exposure limit (STEL) of 0.3 ppm (0.83 mg/m<sup>3</sup>). Improvements in exposure controls, such as implementing the use of a fume cupboard (hood) or other local ventilation when activating the disinfectant solution and improving the utilization of respiratory protective equipment, are therefore required to meet the STEL, but it is recommended that such improvements are also aimed at meeting the proposed Peak limitation of 0.1 ppm that is expected to soon be adopted by Safe Work Australia, replacing the current TWA-8hr and STEL exposure standards.

Journal of Occupational and Environmental HygieneVol. 21(10)
The University of Queensland (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Animal testing and alternatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of chlorine dioxide exposure in an Australian gnotobiotic mouse research facility — Kelly Johnstone, Peter McGarry, et al. · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS