When does the energy transition impact household affordability? A mixed-methods comparison of fourteen coal and carbon-intensive regions

• Energy affordability tends to be lower in phasing-out than in transitioning regions. • Regional conditions are strongly associated with energy affordability. • Global policies misaligned with regional transitions can undermine affordability. • Regional fossil-fuel dependency is associated with low energy affordability. • Aligning energy transition and regional development plans can favor affordability. Understanding what conditions promote or hinder energy affordability in energy transitions is crucial for coal and carbon-intensive regions (CCIRs) dealing with the trade-off between phasing out fossil fuels and deepening social inequalities. While previous studies have included household and national-level conditions, this paper addresses the research gap covering regional-level conditions by drawing from regional energy governance, energy justice, and sociotechnical transition frameworks. A mixed-method approach consisting of a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis and case-study analysis is applied to 14 CCIRs in Europe, Asia, and North America. Results show that energy affordability in CCIRs is influenced by combinations of regional and (inter)national conditions. Whereas the existing literature and transition policies do not differentiate between the CCI sector’s transition type, this paper highlights that conditions underlying energy (un)affordability differ when the CCI sector is phased out or has the option to transition. Based on the findings, this study calls for a multi-level governance approach to alleviating and preventing energy unaffordability and recommends that policy mixes like the EU Just Transition Fund consider the different types of CCIR transitions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Environmental Change
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102936
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When does the energy transition impact household affordability? A mixed-methods comparison of fourteen coal and carbon-intensive regions

Diana Mangalagiu, Nihit Goyal, Jenny Lieu, Thomas Hoppe et al.
8 citations
Global Environmental Change
Energy and Environment Impacts
1.06
article

When does the energy transition impact household affordability? A mixed-methods comparison of fourteen coal and carbon-intensive regions

Diana Mangalagiu, Nihit Goyal, Jenny Lieu, Thomas Hoppe, Amanda Martínez-Reyes
article en
8 citations

Abstract

• Energy affordability tends to be lower in phasing-out than in transitioning regions. • Regional conditions are strongly associated with energy affordability. • Global policies misaligned with regional transitions can undermine affordability. • Regional fossil-fuel dependency is associated with low energy affordability. • Aligning energy transition and regional development plans can favor affordability. Understanding what conditions promote or hinder energy affordability in energy transitions is crucial for coal and carbon-intensive regions (CCIRs) dealing with the trade-off between phasing out fossil fuels and deepening social inequalities. While previous studies have included household and national-level conditions, this paper addresses the research gap covering regional-level conditions by drawing from regional energy governance, energy justice, and sociotechnical transition frameworks. A mixed-method approach consisting of a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis and case-study analysis is applied to 14 CCIRs in Europe, Asia, and North America. Results show that energy affordability in CCIRs is influenced by combinations of regional and (inter)national conditions. Whereas the existing literature and transition policies do not differentiate between the CCI sector’s transition type, this paper highlights that conditions underlying energy (un)affordability differ when the CCI sector is phased out or has the option to transition. Based on the findings, this study calls for a multi-level governance approach to alleviating and preventing energy unaffordability and recommends that policy mixes like the EU Just Transition Fund consider the different types of CCIR transitions.

Global Environmental ChangeVol. 89
NEOMA Business School (FR), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Energy and Environment Impacts
1.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.