‘Are you pregnant? If not, why not?’: artificial reproductive technology and the trauma of infertility

The article scrutinises Rohini S. Rajagopal's work, <i>what's a lemon squeezer doing in my vagina</i> (2021), to illustrate the escalating medicalisation of infertile bodies. In a cultural context where reproductive concerns are construed as medical disorders demanding treatment and surveillance, medical professionals and pharmaceutical companies exploit these sociocultural dynamics to provide infertile couples with immediate solutions through Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Consequently, the study contributes a critical perspective to the field of medical humanities, initiating a nuanced discourse that interrogates the impact of terms such as 'living laboratories', 'baby machine', 'mother machine' and 'hope technology' on our comprehension of future motherhood. Drawing on feminist critiques of medicalisation, the article argues that biotechnology perpetuates the eighteenth-century biomedical metaphor of the body as a machine with replaceable parts. Notably, contemporary advancements in reproductive medicine allow for the replacement of perceived 'flawed' body parts, further objectifying them within this framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Humanities
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2023-012690
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Are you pregnant? If not, why not?’: artificial reproductive technology and the trauma of infertility

Priyanka Tripathi, Soumya Kashyap
2 citations
Medical Humanities
Reproductive Health and Technologies
1.07
article

‘Are you pregnant? If not, why not?’: artificial reproductive technology and the trauma of infertility

Priyanka Tripathi, Soumya Kashyap
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The article scrutinises Rohini S. Rajagopal's work, <i>what's a lemon squeezer doing in my vagina</i> (2021), to illustrate the escalating medicalisation of infertile bodies. In a cultural context where reproductive concerns are construed as medical disorders demanding treatment and surveillance, medical professionals and pharmaceutical companies exploit these sociocultural dynamics to provide infertile couples with immediate solutions through Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Consequently, the study contributes a critical perspective to the field of medical humanities, initiating a nuanced discourse that interrogates the impact of terms such as 'living laboratories', 'baby machine', 'mother machine' and 'hope technology' on our comprehension of future motherhood. Drawing on feminist critiques of medicalisation, the article argues that biotechnology perpetuates the eighteenth-century biomedical metaphor of the body as a machine with replaceable parts. Notably, contemporary advancements in reproductive medicine allow for the replacement of perceived 'flawed' body parts, further objectifying them within this framework.

Medical HumanitiesVol. 51(1)
Indian Institute of Technology Patna (IN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
1.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘Are you pregnant? If not, why not?’: artificial reproductive technology and the trauma of infertility — Priyanka Tripathi, Soumya Kashyap · Medical Humanities (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS