Un frammento inedito di Zenone dagli <i>scholia vetera</i> alle <i>Opere</i> di Esiodo (= Plut. <i>fragmentum novum</i>?)

Abstract The scholia vetera on Works 734–735 are transmitted not only by the manuscript tradition of Hesiod, but also by an entry of the Etymologicum Genuinum . The latter, hitherto largely ignored, offers in several places a better text than the scholia of the Hesiod manuscripts. Particularly significant is the presence of an unpublished fragment of Zeno, who is said to have recommended not copulating while drunk. Analysis of parallels and material-historical specificities of the scholarly tradition relating to Hesiod reveals that this passage should be included (at least as a dubium ) among the fragments of Plutarch’s lost commentary on Hesiod’s Works and Days . Quite surprisingly, it is likely that Proclus is not involved in the transmission of this fragment at all.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philologus
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2024-0004
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Un frammento inedito di Zenone dagli scholia vetera alle Opere di Esiodo (= Plut. fragmentum novum?)

Simone Fiori
Philologus
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

Un frammento inedito di Zenone dagli scholia vetera alle Opere di Esiodo (= Plut. fragmentum novum?)

Simone Fiori
article en

Abstract

Abstract The scholia vetera on Works 734–735 are transmitted not only by the manuscript tradition of Hesiod, but also by an entry of the Etymologicum Genuinum . The latter, hitherto largely ignored, offers in several places a better text than the scholia of the Hesiod manuscripts. Particularly significant is the presence of an unpublished fragment of Zeno, who is said to have recommended not copulating while drunk. Analysis of parallels and material-historical specificities of the scholarly tradition relating to Hesiod reveals that this passage should be included (at least as a dubium ) among the fragments of Plutarch’s lost commentary on Hesiod’s Works and Days . Quite surprisingly, it is likely that Proclus is not involved in the transmission of this fragment at all.

PhilologusVol. 168(2)
University of Genoa (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Un frammento inedito di Zenone dagli <i>scholia vetera</i> alle <i>Opere</i> di Esiodo (= Plut. <i>fragmentum novum</i>?) — Simone Fiori · Philologus (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS