Changes in the Perception of Error Announcements from the German Two-Tier Enforcement

Abstract When the German financial reporting enforcement was introduced in 2004, the legislator chose an innovative approach: He combined a private enforcement institution with a governmental agency while sanctioning was carried out solely by publicly announcing identified accounting errors. Subsequently, investors were confronted with up to then unprecedented ‘error announcements’ from the enforcement system. For a sample of 213 announcements from 2006 to 2019, the paper analyzes the adaptation process of investors to this new information. While significant negative market reactions around the announcement dates can be found for the whole observation period, the results also show that the investors’ views of the error announcements change over time. Especially in the early years, the observed market reactions are strongly linked to the impact of the accounting error on the firm’s financial situation. This link weakens over time and factors related to the nature of the error become more important to investors. In particular, errors that are attributable to the unjustifiable application of professional judgment lead to significantly more negative effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-024-00193-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Business Law and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in the Perception of Error Announcements from the German Two-Tier Enforcement

Marc Berninger
2 citations
Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research
Business Law and Ethics
1.89
article

Changes in the Perception of Error Announcements from the German Two-Tier Enforcement

Marc Berninger
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract When the German financial reporting enforcement was introduced in 2004, the legislator chose an innovative approach: He combined a private enforcement institution with a governmental agency while sanctioning was carried out solely by publicly announcing identified accounting errors. Subsequently, investors were confronted with up to then unprecedented ‘error announcements’ from the enforcement system. For a sample of 213 announcements from 2006 to 2019, the paper analyzes the adaptation process of investors to this new information. While significant negative market reactions around the announcement dates can be found for the whole observation period, the results also show that the investors’ views of the error announcements change over time. Especially in the early years, the observed market reactions are strongly linked to the impact of the accounting error on the firm’s financial situation. This link weakens over time and factors related to the nature of the error become more important to investors. In particular, errors that are attributable to the unjustifiable application of professional judgment lead to significantly more negative effects.

Schmalenbach Journal of Business ResearchVol. 76(4)
Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Business Law and Ethics
1.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Changes in the Perception of Error Announcements from the German Two-Tier Enforcement — Marc Berninger · Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS