Recommendations on recording harms in randomised controlled trials of behaviour change interventions

Harms are possible from behaviour change interventions, such as the worsening of a health behaviour intended for change (rebound effect), improving a health behaviour but with subsequent worsening of another behaviour (risk compensation), and participants feeling targeted or stigmatised by an intervention. The processes and definitions originally designed to record harms within drug trials are typically followed to record harms in trials of behaviour change interventions owing to the lack of alternative guidance. Therefore, important harms could be missed in the evaluations of behaviour change interventions or irrelevant harms data may be recorded, leading to inefficiency. This paper presents evidence informed recommendations on how to record harms in randomised controlled trials of behaviour change interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-077418
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recommendations on recording harms in randomised controlled trials of behaviour change interventions

Cindy Cooper, Cara Mooney, Alicia O’Cathain, Diana Papaioannou et al.
6 citations
BMJ
Behavioral Health and Interventions
2.46
article

Recommendations on recording harms in randomised controlled trials of behaviour change interventions

Cindy Cooper, Cara Mooney, Alicia O’Cathain, Diana Papaioannou, Kirsty Sprange, Sienna Hamer‐Kiwacz
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Harms are possible from behaviour change interventions, such as the worsening of a health behaviour intended for change (rebound effect), improving a health behaviour but with subsequent worsening of another behaviour (risk compensation), and participants feeling targeted or stigmatised by an intervention. The processes and definitions originally designed to record harms within drug trials are typically followed to record harms in trials of behaviour change interventions owing to the lack of alternative guidance. Therefore, important harms could be missed in the evaluations of behaviour change interventions or irrelevant harms data may be recorded, leading to inefficiency. This paper presents evidence informed recommendations on how to record harms in randomised controlled trials of behaviour change interventions.

BMJVol. 387
University of Nottingham (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
2.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Recommendations on recording harms in randomised controlled trials of behaviour change interventions — Cindy Cooper, Cara Mooney, et al. · BMJ (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS