A Qualitative Study on Using Telemedicine for Precepting and Teaching in the Academic Setting

Purpose To examine the impact of telemedicine use on precepting and teaching among preceptors and patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method The authors conducted a secondary analysis of a qualitative study focusing on providers’ and patients’ experiences with and attitudes toward telemedicine at 4 academic health centers. Teaching and precepting were emergent codes from the data and organized into themes. Themes were mapped to domains from the 2009 Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), a framework that assists with effective implementation and consists of 5 domains: intervention characteristics, outer settings, inner settings, characteristics of individuals, and process. Results In total, 86 interviews were conducted with 65 patients and 21 providers. Nine providers and 3 patients recounted descriptions related to teaching and precepting with telemedicine. Eight themes were identified, mapping across all 5 CFIR domains, with the majority of themes (n = 6) within the domains of characteristics of individuals, processes, and intervention characteristics. Providers and patients described how a lack of prepandemic telemedicine experience and inadequate processes in place to precept and teach with telemedicine affected the learning environment and perceived quality of care. They also discussed how telemedicine exacerbated existing difficulties in maintaining resident continuity. Providers described ways communication changed with telemedicine use during the pandemic, including having to wear masks while in the same room as the trainee and sitting closely to remain within range of the camera, as well as the benefit of observing trainees with the attending’s camera off. Providers expressed a lack of protected structure and time for teaching and supervising with telemedicine, and a general view that telemedicine is here to stay. Conclusions Efforts should focus on increasing knowledge of telemedicine skills and improving processes to implement telemedicine in the teaching setting in order to best integrate it into undergraduate and graduate medical education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/qmjn-9a44
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Qualitative Study on Using Telemedicine for Precepting and Teaching in the Academic Setting

Brittany J. Raffa, Kori B. Flower, Jenny J. Lin, Rainu Kaushal et al.
UNC Libraries
Education and Learning Interventions
article

A Qualitative Study on Using Telemedicine for Precepting and Teaching in the Academic Setting

Brittany J. Raffa, Kori B. Flower, Jenny J. Lin, Rainu Kaushal, Katerina Andreadis, Carol R. Horowitz, Jessica S. Ancker, Kimberly Muellers
article en

Abstract

Purpose To examine the impact of telemedicine use on precepting and teaching among preceptors and patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method The authors conducted a secondary analysis of a qualitative study focusing on providers’ and patients’ experiences with and attitudes toward telemedicine at 4 academic health centers. Teaching and precepting were emergent codes from the data and organized into themes. Themes were mapped to domains from the 2009 Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), a framework that assists with effective implementation and consists of 5 domains: intervention characteristics, outer settings, inner settings, characteristics of individuals, and process. Results In total, 86 interviews were conducted with 65 patients and 21 providers. Nine providers and 3 patients recounted descriptions related to teaching and precepting with telemedicine. Eight themes were identified, mapping across all 5 CFIR domains, with the majority of themes (n = 6) within the domains of characteristics of individuals, processes, and intervention characteristics. Providers and patients described how a lack of prepandemic telemedicine experience and inadequate processes in place to precept and teach with telemedicine affected the learning environment and perceived quality of care. They also discussed how telemedicine exacerbated existing difficulties in maintaining resident continuity. Providers described ways communication changed with telemedicine use during the pandemic, including having to wear masks while in the same room as the trainee and sitting closely to remain within range of the camera, as well as the benefit of observing trainees with the attending’s camera off. Providers expressed a lack of protected structure and time for teaching and supervising with telemedicine, and a general view that telemedicine is here to stay. Conclusions Efforts should focus on increasing knowledge of telemedicine skills and improving processes to implement telemedicine in the teaching setting in order to best integrate it into undergraduate and graduate medical education.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Health Resources and Services Administration, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Education and Learning Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.