Variation Patterns and Affecting Factors of Plant Alpha Diversity, Beta Diversity and Its Components in Restoration Grasslands on Loess Plateau

ABSTRACT Understanding spatiotemporal variation in diversity and identifying key external affecting factors are essential for biodiversity conservation. However, community assembly and species diversity in natural grassland (NG) restoration on the Loess Plateau remain unclear. In this study, we examined α diversity (species richness), β diversity (βtotal), and its components (βrepl and βrich) across 89 grassland communities, which were categorized into five restoration stages: recent grassland (RG), early restoration (ER), middle restoration (MR), later restoration (LR), and NG. Linear mixed models (LMM) were used to analyze the effects of topographic, soil, and landscape factors on diversity. Results showed that α diversity followed an increasing‐decreasing trend across restoration stages (7–21 species m −2 ), peaking at the MR stage. In contrast, β diversity and its two components declined with duration, with βtotal and βrepl being notably higher in ER than in LR and NG. Differences in βtotal primarily resulted from species replacement (βrepl, 61%–70%), with a smaller contribution from species gain and loss (βrich, 30%–39%). The LMM also revealed that restoration stage was the most important factor affecting plant diversity, explaining 59.3%, 68.4%, 53.5%, and 58.8% of richness, βtotal, βrepl, and βrich, respectively. In comparison, landscape had weaker effects on diversity (17.2%, 24.2%, 46.5%, 39.8%), while topography and soil factors had the least effects. In summary, deterministic processes (restoration stage) dominate natural restoration, but substantial differences persist between restoration grassland and NG. This study provides valuable insights for assessing restoration progress, prioritizing conservation areas, and informing future grassland management in semi‐arid and fragmented regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Degradation and Development
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5287
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Forest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in China
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variation Patterns and Affecting Factors of Plant Alpha Diversity, Beta Diversity and Its Components in Restoration Grasslands on Loess Plateau

Junjie Zhou, Bingcheng Xu, Chunxia Jian, Yang Luo
4 citations
Land Degradation and Development
Forest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in China
8.38
article

Variation Patterns and Affecting Factors of Plant Alpha Diversity, Beta Diversity and Its Components in Restoration Grasslands on Loess Plateau

Junjie Zhou, Bingcheng Xu, Chunxia Jian, Yang Luo
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Understanding spatiotemporal variation in diversity and identifying key external affecting factors are essential for biodiversity conservation. However, community assembly and species diversity in natural grassland (NG) restoration on the Loess Plateau remain unclear. In this study, we examined α diversity (species richness), β diversity (βtotal), and its components (βrepl and βrich) across 89 grassland communities, which were categorized into five restoration stages: recent grassland (RG), early restoration (ER), middle restoration (MR), later restoration (LR), and NG. Linear mixed models (LMM) were used to analyze the effects of topographic, soil, and landscape factors on diversity. Results showed that α diversity followed an increasing‐decreasing trend across restoration stages (7–21 species m −2 ), peaking at the MR stage. In contrast, β diversity and its two components declined with duration, with βtotal and βrepl being notably higher in ER than in LR and NG. Differences in βtotal primarily resulted from species replacement (βrepl, 61%–70%), with a smaller contribution from species gain and loss (βrich, 30%–39%). The LMM also revealed that restoration stage was the most important factor affecting plant diversity, explaining 59.3%, 68.4%, 53.5%, and 58.8% of richness, βtotal, βrepl, and βrich, respectively. In comparison, landscape had weaker effects on diversity (17.2%, 24.2%, 46.5%, 39.8%), while topography and soil factors had the least effects. In summary, deterministic processes (restoration stage) dominate natural restoration, but substantial differences persist between restoration grassland and NG. This study provides valuable insights for assessing restoration progress, prioritizing conservation areas, and informing future grassland management in semi‐arid and fragmented regions.

Land Degradation and DevelopmentVol. 35(17)
Institute of Soil and Water Conservation (CN), Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China (CN), Northwest A&F University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Forest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in China
8.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.