DECODING THE MOLECULAR WARFARE: ANTI-CRISPR PROTEINS AS GUARDIANS OF PRECISION IN CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS

The Red Queen hypothesis posits that in the perpetual struggle for survival, organisms must continually adapt and develop new defense mechanisms against parasites to avoid extinction.The coevolutionary dynamics between bacteria and the viruses that prey on them, called phages, demonstrate this evolutionary dynamic [1].To protect themselves from phage predation, bacteria use a variety of tactics, such as toxin-antitoxin modules, restriction-modification enzymes, and CRISPR-Cas systems [2].As a result, phages have developed strategies to get around these defenses, including altering restriction sites and creating compounds that neutralize toxins.Additionally, defense mechanisms against dangerous mobile genetic elements (MGEs), like viruses and plasmids [3], have been established by bacteria and archaea.CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) genes are common defense Berryish Metha C.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Exploratory Animal and Medical Research
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52635/eamr/14(s2)25-32
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DECODING THE MOLECULAR WARFARE: ANTI-CRISPR PROTEINS AS GUARDIANS OF PRECISION IN CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS

M. Dhanvarsha, Berryish Metha C.
1 links
Exploratory Animal and Medical Research
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
article

DECODING THE MOLECULAR WARFARE: ANTI-CRISPR PROTEINS AS GUARDIANS OF PRECISION IN CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS

M. Dhanvarsha, Berryish Metha C.
article en

Abstract

The Red Queen hypothesis posits that in the perpetual struggle for survival, organisms must continually adapt and develop new defense mechanisms against parasites to avoid extinction.The coevolutionary dynamics between bacteria and the viruses that prey on them, called phages, demonstrate this evolutionary dynamic [1].To protect themselves from phage predation, bacteria use a variety of tactics, such as toxin-antitoxin modules, restriction-modification enzymes, and CRISPR-Cas systems [2].As a result, phages have developed strategies to get around these defenses, including altering restriction sites and creating compounds that neutralize toxins.Additionally, defense mechanisms against dangerous mobile genetic elements (MGEs), like viruses and plasmids [3], have been established by bacteria and archaea.CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) genes are common defense Berryish Metha C.

Exploratory Animal and Medical ResearchVol. 14(Superbug Spl.)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

DECODING THE MOLECULAR WARFARE: ANTI-CRISPR PROTEINS AS GUARDIANS OF PRECISION IN CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS — M. Dhanvarsha, Berryish Metha C. · Exploratory Animal and Medical Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS