Subjectivity has become a reality: on the functioning of the Federation Council of the Federation Assembly of the Russian Federation in post-soviet Russia

This article analyzes some features of the conflict between the government and deputies of the Federation Council in 1997. The main reason for this conflict was the negative economic situation in the Primorsky Territory, coupled with an attempt to deprive the governor of the region, E. I. Nazdratenko, of his powers. As a result of the conflict, it became obvious to the entire political class that it was unrealistic to deprive the post of the head of the region elected by the people on the initiative of Moscow. It was also clearly demonstrated that the system of checks and balances in post-Soviet Russia exists de facto, and not only de jure. The possibility of making significant decisions at the federal level without taking into account the opinions of the regions and their heads has become extremely low. Thus, the Federation Council has finally proved its subjectivity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Vestnik BIST (Bashkir Institute of Social Technologies)
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47598/2078-9025-2024-3-64-24-28
Primary Topic
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subjectivity has become a reality: on the functioning of the Federation Council of the Federation Assembly of the Russian Federation in post-soviet Russia

А. А. Фоменков, Konstantin D. Gusev, Elizaveta A. Pakhomova
1,064 links
Vestnik BIST (Bashkir Institute of Social Technologies)
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
article

Subjectivity has become a reality: on the functioning of the Federation Council of the Federation Assembly of the Russian Federation in post-soviet Russia

А. А. Фоменков, Konstantin D. Gusev, Elizaveta A. Pakhomova
article en

Abstract

This article analyzes some features of the conflict between the government and deputies of the Federation Council in 1997. The main reason for this conflict was the negative economic situation in the Primorsky Territory, coupled with an attempt to deprive the governor of the region, E. I. Nazdratenko, of his powers. As a result of the conflict, it became obvious to the entire political class that it was unrealistic to deprive the post of the head of the region elected by the people on the initiative of Moscow. It was also clearly demonstrated that the system of checks and balances in post-Soviet Russia exists de facto, and not only de jure. The possibility of making significant decisions at the federal level without taking into account the opinions of the regions and their heads has become extremely low. Thus, the Federation Council has finally proved its subjectivity.

Vestnik BIST (Bashkir Institute of Social Technologies)(3(64))
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.