Discrepancy in Execution Time: Static vs. Dynamic Reconfigurable Hardware

Utilization of FPGAs has increased dramatically in various application domains, mainly due to their unique traits. Especially, FPGAs' dynamic partial reconfiguration feature enables multiple and complex/large applications to be executed on a single chip, regardless of them fitting on chip. From our previous work on dynamic partial reconfigurable hardware for complex applications, we observed a discrepancy in execution time between static reconfigurable hardware (SRH) versus dynamic reconfigurable hardware (DRH). In this paper, we perform additional experiments/analysis to investigate this discrepancy, using a simple adder and a multiplier to compose our SRH and DRH designs. Our experimental results and analysis demonstrate that this discrepancy is not due to actual add/multiply operations, but due to difference in read/write operations to/from SDRAM for SRH vs. DRH, and difference between the two hardware versions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/pacrim61180.2024.10690194
Primary Topic
Embedded Systems Design Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discrepancy in Execution Time: Static vs. Dynamic Reconfigurable Hardware

Kin F. Li, Darshika G. Perera
Embedded Systems Design Techniques
article

Discrepancy in Execution Time: Static vs. Dynamic Reconfigurable Hardware

Kin F. Li, Darshika G. Perera
article en

Abstract

Utilization of FPGAs has increased dramatically in various application domains, mainly due to their unique traits. Especially, FPGAs' dynamic partial reconfiguration feature enables multiple and complex/large applications to be executed on a single chip, regardless of them fitting on chip. From our previous work on dynamic partial reconfigurable hardware for complex applications, we observed a discrepancy in execution time between static reconfigurable hardware (SRH) versus dynamic reconfigurable hardware (DRH). In this paper, we perform additional experiments/analysis to investigate this discrepancy, using a simple adder and a multiplier to compose our SRH and DRH designs. Our experimental results and analysis demonstrate that this discrepancy is not due to actual add/multiply operations, but due to difference in read/write operations to/from SDRAM for SRH vs. DRH, and difference between the two hardware versions.

University of Victoria (CA), University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Embedded Systems Design Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.