Implementation and Investigation of the Operation of a SAW Sensor in the Feedback Loop of Sinusoidal Oscillators

SAW sensors find widespread use across various measured quantities, especially in biological or chemical applications. Measurements with SAW usually happen through the open-loop approach, which requires a vector network analyzer to measure the phase and magnitude of the output signal. These devices do not allow automation and integration in multi-sensor systems. An alternative approach called closed-loop offers reduced cost and complexity. In this method, only the frequency is to be observed. Closed-loop circuits implement SAW sensors in the feedback loop of sinusoidal oscillators. Doing so is still a challenge due to the lack of reliable oscillator topologies that resist perturbations in the sensor's surface. In this paper, we design a closed-loop SAW measurement circuit that effectively maintains oscillation when the SAW sensor is included in the closed loop. We compare the inclusion of SAW equivalent models in the feedback loop of our oscillator. We discuss their differences to investigate which SAW model that most accurately represents the response of the real sensor. Our results confirm the effectiveness of our oscillator as part of a sensor, shifting > 100 kHz when the SAW device is perturbed with a drop of water.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/inscit62583.2024.10693386
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation and Investigation of the Operation of a SAW Sensor in the Feedback Loop of Sinusoidal Oscillators

Paulo Nogueira, A B Nunes, Elyson Á. N. Carvalho, Maxence Rube et al.
1 citations
Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
0.35
article

Implementation and Investigation of the Operation of a SAW Sensor in the Feedback Loop of Sinusoidal Oscillators

Paulo Nogueira, A B Nunes, Elyson Á. N. Carvalho, Maxence Rube, Raphael Cardoso, P.A.A. Barroso, Raimundo C. S. Freire, Stéphane Carvalho, José Carvalho
article en
1 citations

Abstract

SAW sensors find widespread use across various measured quantities, especially in biological or chemical applications. Measurements with SAW usually happen through the open-loop approach, which requires a vector network analyzer to measure the phase and magnitude of the output signal. These devices do not allow automation and integration in multi-sensor systems. An alternative approach called closed-loop offers reduced cost and complexity. In this method, only the frequency is to be observed. Closed-loop circuits implement SAW sensors in the feedback loop of sinusoidal oscillators. Doing so is still a challenge due to the lack of reliable oscillator topologies that resist perturbations in the sensor's surface. In this paper, we design a closed-loop SAW measurement circuit that effectively maintains oscillation when the SAW sensor is included in the closed loop. We compare the inclusion of SAW equivalent models in the feedback loop of our oscillator. We discuss their differences to investigate which SAW model that most accurately represents the response of the real sensor. Our results confirm the effectiveness of our oscillator as part of a sensor, shifting > 100 kHz when the SAW device is perturbed with a drop of water.

Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), École Centrale de Lyon (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Universidade Federal de Sergipe (BR), University of French Guiana (GF), Institut des Nanotechnologies de Lyon (FR), Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (BR), Institute of Nanotechnology (GB), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (FR), École d'Ingénieurs en Chimie et Sciences du Numérique (FR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.