The Efficiency of HEVC/H.265, AV1, and VVC/H.266 in Terms of Performance Compression and Video Content

In recent times, there has been a significant focus on digital compression. The purpose of this study is to undertake a comparative evaluation and examination of the efficacy of the latest standards, namely HEVC, AVI, and its successor VVC. The determination of which standard to utilize relies heavily on factors such as the inherent characteristics of the video, its functionalities, quantization parameters, image quality, as well as the size and video content, this latter, is often classified by spatio-temporal complexity using spatial and temporal information (SI/TI). In reality, they are mostly used for original video sources. The efficiency of encoding original video sources is unknown. The results show that each standard has characteristics that sometimes make it superior to others. In addition, We observe that By understanding how SI and TI affect encoding efficiency, we will be able to better optimize the encoding process and reduce the amount of data that needs to be stored, transmitted, and processed. This could help to reduce the amount of time and energy required to encode video content, as well as reduce the amount of storage space needed to store it. Compared to H.265/HEVC, AV1 is more efficient at compressing HD and FHD video, and more efficient for SD video. In addition, experiments show that VVC/H.266 has higher compression efficiency.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (IJEEI)
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52549/ijeei.v12i3.5336
Primary Topic
Video Coding and Compression Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Efficiency of HEVC/H.265, AV1, and VVC/H.266 in Terms of Performance Compression and Video Content

Abdelhakim Sahour, Fouzia Maamri, Hanane Djellab, Farouk Boumehrez
Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (IJEEI)
Video Coding and Compression Technologies
article

The Efficiency of HEVC/H.265, AV1, and VVC/H.266 in Terms of Performance Compression and Video Content

Abdelhakim Sahour, Fouzia Maamri, Hanane Djellab, Farouk Boumehrez
article en

Abstract

In recent times, there has been a significant focus on digital compression. The purpose of this study is to undertake a comparative evaluation and examination of the efficacy of the latest standards, namely HEVC, AVI, and its successor VVC. The determination of which standard to utilize relies heavily on factors such as the inherent characteristics of the video, its functionalities, quantization parameters, image quality, as well as the size and video content, this latter, is often classified by spatio-temporal complexity using spatial and temporal information (SI/TI). In reality, they are mostly used for original video sources. The efficiency of encoding original video sources is unknown. The results show that each standard has characteristics that sometimes make it superior to others. In addition, We observe that By understanding how SI and TI affect encoding efficiency, we will be able to better optimize the encoding process and reduce the amount of data that needs to be stored, transmitted, and processed. This could help to reduce the amount of time and energy required to encode video content, as well as reduce the amount of storage space needed to store it. Compared to H.265/HEVC, AV1 is more efficient at compressing HD and FHD video, and more efficient for SD video. In addition, experiments show that VVC/H.266 has higher compression efficiency.

Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (IJEEI)Vol. 12(3)
Direction Générale de la Recherche Scientifique et du Développement Technologique
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Video Coding and Compression Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.