A Retrospective Assessment of Guideline Adherence and Treatment Outcomes From <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Infection Following the IDSA 2021 Clinical Guideline Update: <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Infection

Abstract Background The 2021 update to the Infectious Diseases Society of America Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) guidelines recommended fidaxomicin as the preferred treatment over vancomycin for patients with initial and recurrent CDI. Few studies have examined how treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of hospitalized CDI patients changed after the postguideline update or contemporary real-world outcomes of fidaxomicin vs vancomycin. Methods This retrospective, observational study used the PINC AI Healthcare Database on adult patients who received CDI treatment between 1/2020 and 6/2021 (pre period) and between 10/2021 and 9/2022 (post period). We examined treatment patterns of fidaxomicin, vancomycin, and metronidazole, as well as clinical and health care resource use outcomes of patients treated exclusively with fidaxomicin vs vancomycin, using nearest-neighbor propensity matching and hierarchical regression methods. As a sensitivity analysis, we repeated the fidaxomicin vs vancomycin comparisons among patients with recurrent and nonrecurrent index infections. Results A total of 45 049 patients with CDI from 779 US hospitals met initial inclusion criteria. Comparing the pre vs post periods, the proportion of patients treated with fidaxomicin increased from 5.9% to 13.7% (P &amp;lt; .001), vancomycin use decreased from 87.9% to 82.9% (P &amp;lt; .001), and metronidazole use decreased from 21.6% to 17.2% (P &amp;lt; .001). When comparing fidaxomicin vs vancomycin in the post period, fidaxomicin was associated with lower CDI recurrence (6.1% vs 10.2%; P &amp;lt; .001) and higher sustained clinical response (91.7% vs 87.8%; P &amp;lt; .001). Ninety-day postdischarge costs were not significantly different between groups. A sensitivity analyses showed similar findings. Conclusions Since the 2021 guideline update, fidaxomicin use has increased significantly but could be further utilized given its association with better clinical outcomes and no increase in postdischarge costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae524
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Retrospective Assessment of Guideline Adherence and Treatment Outcomes From Clostridioides difficile Infection Following the IDSA 2021 Clinical Guideline Update: Clostridioides difficile Infection

Vladimir Turzhitsky, Fakhar Siddiqui, N Engels, Qinghua Li et al.
5 citations
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
1.95
article

A Retrospective Assessment of Guideline Adherence and Treatment Outcomes From Clostridioides difficile Infection Following the IDSA 2021 Clinical Guideline Update: Clostridioides difficile Infection

Vladimir Turzhitsky, Fakhar Siddiqui, N Engels, Qinghua Li, Erik R. Dubberke, Brian Harris Nathanson
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The 2021 update to the Infectious Diseases Society of America Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) guidelines recommended fidaxomicin as the preferred treatment over vancomycin for patients with initial and recurrent CDI. Few studies have examined how treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of hospitalized CDI patients changed after the postguideline update or contemporary real-world outcomes of fidaxomicin vs vancomycin. Methods This retrospective, observational study used the PINC AI Healthcare Database on adult patients who received CDI treatment between 1/2020 and 6/2021 (pre period) and between 10/2021 and 9/2022 (post period). We examined treatment patterns of fidaxomicin, vancomycin, and metronidazole, as well as clinical and health care resource use outcomes of patients treated exclusively with fidaxomicin vs vancomycin, using nearest-neighbor propensity matching and hierarchical regression methods. As a sensitivity analysis, we repeated the fidaxomicin vs vancomycin comparisons among patients with recurrent and nonrecurrent index infections. Results A total of 45 049 patients with CDI from 779 US hospitals met initial inclusion criteria. Comparing the pre vs post periods, the proportion of patients treated with fidaxomicin increased from 5.9% to 13.7% (P &amp;lt; .001), vancomycin use decreased from 87.9% to 82.9% (P &amp;lt; .001), and metronidazole use decreased from 21.6% to 17.2% (P &amp;lt; .001). When comparing fidaxomicin vs vancomycin in the post period, fidaxomicin was associated with lower CDI recurrence (6.1% vs 10.2%; P &amp;lt; .001) and higher sustained clinical response (91.7% vs 87.8%; P &amp;lt; .001). Ninety-day postdischarge costs were not significantly different between groups. A sensitivity analyses showed similar findings. Conclusions Since the 2021 guideline update, fidaxomicin use has increased significantly but could be further utilized given its association with better clinical outcomes and no increase in postdischarge costs.

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 11(10)
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Optim Design (United States) (US)
Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Merck
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
1.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.