Landscape heterogeneity correlates with bee and pollen diversity while size and specialization degree explain species-specific responses of wild bees to the environment

Access to adequate pollen sources in agricultural landscapes is critical for the nutrition and development of bees. The type and quantity of pollen available to bees and may be determined by local plant diversity, land-use intensity and landscape structure but different bee species likely respond differently to these parameters. Identifying community and specific responses is therefore imperative to understand pollinator population dynamics in agricultural landscapes. We sampled bees in 36 plots along a land-use gradient at 4 sites in Belgium and Germany over two years. We collected 1821 bees from 100 bee species and constructed a pollen foraging network with 36 common wild bee species based on pollen metabarcoding. We investigated differences in community responses and species-specific responses to environmental variables. Landscape heterogeneity positively correlated with bee species richness, diversity and functional richness, and significantly explained bee community composition per plot. Bee collected pollen diversity correlated with bee species diversity. Furthermore, landscape heterogeneity positively correlated with bee collected pollen diversity when pooling abundant bee species, while it did not correlate with pollen diversity of the most abundant generalists. Land-use intensity and local plant diversity had no significant effect on bee diversity. Larger bees showed negative responses to increasing land-use intensity and bees with more specialized diets showed positive correlations with landscape heterogeneity. Our study goes beyond mere floral diversity and provides new insight into the responses of wild bee communities to landscape structure and regional pollen availability, as well as the interplay between bee abundance and pollen foraging traits. Our results highlight the importance of determining species-specific nutritional needs and considering landscape level structure in pollinator conservation programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Science of The Total Environment
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176595
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Landscape heterogeneity correlates with bee and pollen diversity while size and specialization degree explain species-specific responses of wild bees to the environment

Ivan Meeus, Niels Piot, Alexander Keller, Jean‐Luc Brunet et al.
14 citations
The Science of The Total Environment
Plant and animal studies
14.41
article

Landscape heterogeneity correlates with bee and pollen diversity while size and specialization degree explain species-specific responses of wild bees to the environment

Ivan Meeus, Niels Piot, Alexander Keller, Jean‐Luc Brunet, Michael Kuhlmann, Clémentine Leroy, Sean F. Werle, Louella Buydens, María Alejandra Parreño, Michał Filipiak, Sara D. Leonhardt, Mickaël Henry, Stuart P. M. Roberts, C. Alaux, Fabrice Réquier, Sumeer Koirala, A-M Klein
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Access to adequate pollen sources in agricultural landscapes is critical for the nutrition and development of bees. The type and quantity of pollen available to bees and may be determined by local plant diversity, land-use intensity and landscape structure but different bee species likely respond differently to these parameters. Identifying community and specific responses is therefore imperative to understand pollinator population dynamics in agricultural landscapes. We sampled bees in 36 plots along a land-use gradient at 4 sites in Belgium and Germany over two years. We collected 1821 bees from 100 bee species and constructed a pollen foraging network with 36 common wild bee species based on pollen metabarcoding. We investigated differences in community responses and species-specific responses to environmental variables. Landscape heterogeneity positively correlated with bee species richness, diversity and functional richness, and significantly explained bee community composition per plot. Bee collected pollen diversity correlated with bee species diversity. Furthermore, landscape heterogeneity positively correlated with bee collected pollen diversity when pooling abundant bee species, while it did not correlate with pollen diversity of the most abundant generalists. Land-use intensity and local plant diversity had no significant effect on bee diversity. Larger bees showed negative responses to increasing land-use intensity and bees with more specialized diets showed positive correlations with landscape heterogeneity. Our study goes beyond mere floral diversity and provides new insight into the responses of wild bee communities to landscape structure and regional pollen availability, as well as the interplay between bee abundance and pollen foraging traits. Our results highlight the importance of determining species-specific nutritional needs and considering landscape level structure in pollinator conservation programs.

The Science of The Total EnvironmentVol. 954
Jagiellonian University (PL), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Freiburg (DE), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Salisbury District Hospital (GB), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), Ghent University (BE), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Évolution, Génomes, Comportement, Écologie (FR), Molecular Networks (Germany) (DE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Technical University of Munich (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
UK Research and Innovation, Biodiversa+, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Universiteit Gent, Vlaamse regering, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council, Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Plant and animal studies
14.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.