Using Nash Equilibrium to Reduce Number of Attacks Between the Arguments in Dung’s Argumentation Framework

For intelligent systems, argumentation is a very important factor to point out in Artificial Intelligence (AI) as it represents an essential component. It is one of the critical approaches to making a decision, whereas Dung introduces a mathematical model that classifies attacks among arguments based on ordered pairs. Furthermore, weights’ addition to the arguments is one of the most important developments. It is done by several methods of weight calculation; hence, the Fuzzy weights method is a suitable method when working with game theory (GT). To this end, this paper introduced the GT in a Nash equilibrium method to redraw the acceptable arguments. It depends on the fuzzy weight for reducing the acceptable arguments and acceptable attacks between those arguments. This paper provides an automatic model for reducing the number of arguments and attacks between them called the shorthand model based on the gaming argumentation framework SGAF by extending the gaming argumentation framework GAF. This work uses the Cash on Delivery (COD) Payment Model as a case study.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Iraqi Journal of Science
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2024.65.9.34
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Nash Equilibrium to Reduce Number of Attacks Between the Arguments in Dung’s Argumentation Framework

Hasanen S. Abdulah, Adnan Taher Kareem, Ahmed T. Sadiq
Iraqi Journal of Science
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Using Nash Equilibrium to Reduce Number of Attacks Between the Arguments in Dung’s Argumentation Framework

Hasanen S. Abdulah, Adnan Taher Kareem, Ahmed T. Sadiq
article en

Abstract

For intelligent systems, argumentation is a very important factor to point out in Artificial Intelligence (AI) as it represents an essential component. It is one of the critical approaches to making a decision, whereas Dung introduces a mathematical model that classifies attacks among arguments based on ordered pairs. Furthermore, weights’ addition to the arguments is one of the most important developments. It is done by several methods of weight calculation; hence, the Fuzzy weights method is a suitable method when working with game theory (GT). To this end, this paper introduced the GT in a Nash equilibrium method to redraw the acceptable arguments. It depends on the fuzzy weight for reducing the acceptable arguments and acceptable attacks between those arguments. This paper provides an automatic model for reducing the number of arguments and attacks between them called the shorthand model based on the gaming argumentation framework SGAF by extending the gaming argumentation framework GAF. This work uses the Cash on Delivery (COD) Payment Model as a case study.

Iraqi Journal of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using Nash Equilibrium to Reduce Number of Attacks Between the Arguments in Dung’s Argumentation Framework — Hasanen S. Abdulah, Adnan Taher Kareem, et al. · Iraqi Journal of Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS