Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of the SARC‐F, SARC‐CalF, and Ishii tests for diagnosis of sarcopenia in hospitalized older patients: A cross‐sectional study

SARC-CalF demonstrates the highest performance in terms of sensitivity and specificity compared with the other two tests, making it a valuable tool for detecting sarcopenia in hospital settings. In contrast, the Ishii test exhibits high sensitivity but low specificity within this population. Based on our results, we found that SARC-CalF can be used as a simple, effective test for identifying sarcopenia in older patients in the hospital setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11204
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of the SARC‐F, SARC‐CalF, and Ishii tests for diagnosis of sarcopenia in hospitalized older patients: A cross‐sectional study

Volkan Atmış, Oğuzcan Gümüşçubuk, Ahmet Yalçın, Murat Varlı et al.
3 citations
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
Nutrition and Health in Aging
0.98
article

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of the SARC‐F, SARC‐CalF, and Ishii tests for diagnosis of sarcopenia in hospitalized older patients: A cross‐sectional study

Volkan Atmış, Oğuzcan Gümüşçubuk, Ahmet Yalçın, Murat Varlı, Büşra Gökçe, Görkem Turhan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

SARC-CalF demonstrates the highest performance in terms of sensitivity and specificity compared with the other two tests, making it a valuable tool for detecting sarcopenia in hospital settings. In contrast, the Ishii test exhibits high sensitivity but low specificity within this population. Based on our results, we found that SARC-CalF can be used as a simple, effective test for identifying sarcopenia in older patients in the hospital setting.

Nutrition in Clinical PracticeVol. 39(6)
Ankara University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
0.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.