Infrastructures of Surveillance and Control in the Invisible City of Waste

This paper offers a situated analysis of infrastructures of surveillance and control in Rotterdam through Latour & Hermant’s concept of the oligopticon. Oligopticons are networked devices and their supporting infrastructures that render the city in extremely narrow but very clear representations, in this case as a city of waste hotspots. In Rotterdam, public management is designing data-hungry oligopticons that map, control and intervene in the illegal disposal of waste and litter. An analysis of two vignettes from the author’s ethnographic fieldwork finds that these oligopticons do more than simply make visible and control these practices of waste disposal: they instead engage in punitive politics that frames those who illegally dispose of waste as exceptions to a normalizing way of life, fighting not waste but difference. Through ethnographic comparison, this paper aims to evoke thought, imagination and reflection in readers regarding the consequences of infrastructures of surveillance and control and the intimate knowledge that may escape these infrastructures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Epistemology
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2024.2400080
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Infrastructures of Surveillance and Control in the Invisible City of Waste

Kevin Pijpers
2 citations
Social Epistemology
Water Governance and Infrastructure
4.46
article

Infrastructures of Surveillance and Control in the Invisible City of Waste

Kevin Pijpers
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper offers a situated analysis of infrastructures of surveillance and control in Rotterdam through Latour & Hermant’s concept of the oligopticon. Oligopticons are networked devices and their supporting infrastructures that render the city in extremely narrow but very clear representations, in this case as a city of waste hotspots. In Rotterdam, public management is designing data-hungry oligopticons that map, control and intervene in the illegal disposal of waste and litter. An analysis of two vignettes from the author’s ethnographic fieldwork finds that these oligopticons do more than simply make visible and control these practices of waste disposal: they instead engage in punitive politics that frames those who illegally dispose of waste as exceptions to a normalizing way of life, fighting not waste but difference. Through ethnographic comparison, this paper aims to evoke thought, imagination and reflection in readers regarding the consequences of infrastructures of surveillance and control and the intimate knowledge that may escape these infrastructures.

Social EpistemologyVol. 39(3)
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Infrastructures of Surveillance and Control in the Invisible City of Waste — Kevin Pijpers · Social Epistemology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS