Reflective Design for Informal Participatory Algorithm Auditing: A Case Study with Emotion AI

This paper suggests how reflective design can aid informal participatory algorithm auditing. Drawing from reflective design, we designed a simple web-form probe to invite critical reflection on Emotion AI, ethically controversial techniques predicting individuals’ emotions. Participants engaged the probe throughout their daily lives for about a week. Then, we interviewed participants about their experiences and reflections. Our findings surface themes around participants’ (i) critiques of Emotion AI, (ii) factors contributing to inaccuracy, and (iii) patterns of miscategorization. Our discussion contributes (1) recommendations for Emotion AI and (2) how reflective design may offer considerations to inform algorithm auditing. Overall, our paper suggests ways critically-oriented design research can engage AI ethics through informal, participatory, exploratory algorithm auditing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3679318.3685411
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reflective Design for Informal Participatory Algorithm Auditing: A Case Study with Emotion AI

Noura Howell, Watson F Hartsoe, Vyshnavi Namani, Jacob Amin
4 citations
Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.03
article

Reflective Design for Informal Participatory Algorithm Auditing: A Case Study with Emotion AI

Noura Howell, Watson F Hartsoe, Vyshnavi Namani, Jacob Amin
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper suggests how reflective design can aid informal participatory algorithm auditing. Drawing from reflective design, we designed a simple web-form probe to invite critical reflection on Emotion AI, ethically controversial techniques predicting individuals’ emotions. Participants engaged the probe throughout their daily lives for about a week. Then, we interviewed participants about their experiences and reflections. Our findings surface themes around participants’ (i) critiques of Emotion AI, (ii) factors contributing to inaccuracy, and (iii) patterns of miscategorization. Our discussion contributes (1) recommendations for Emotion AI and (2) how reflective design may offer considerations to inform algorithm auditing. Overall, our paper suggests ways critically-oriented design research can engage AI ethics through informal, participatory, exploratory algorithm auditing.

Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.