A Case Study on the Inclusiveness of Biometric Technologies for Individuals with Congenital Disabilities

Biometric technologies are often advertised as a user-friendly way to authenticate individuals based on behavioural or biological characteristics. In recent years, biometric recognition has become ubiquitous in various application domains ranging from smartphone unlocking to border control. With the evolution of biometrics, ethical concerns have emerged with respect to the fairness or inclusiveness of these technologies. While many research efforts have been devoted towards investigating race and gender, little to no efforts have been put into studying the inclusiveness of biometric systems for disabled individuals. This work aims to address this gap in knowledge and shed light on this important matter. To this end, an online questionnaire as well as a usability study with smartphone biometrics was conducted with groups of disabled individuals. Obtained findings indicate disparities in the difficulties faced by disabled individuals compared to nondisabled individuals. Furthermore, it was observed that nondisabled individuals perceive biometric systems as being more inclusive towards disabled individuals than people living with disabilities perceive them to be. Moreover, the conducted usability experiment confirmed that accessibility issues are a real challenge for disabled individuals when using biometric systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3679318.3685485
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Case Study on the Inclusiveness of Biometric Technologies for Individuals with Congenital Disabilities

Jascha Kolberg, Christian Rathgeb, Berglind Ólafsdóttir
2 citations
Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
0.30
article

A Case Study on the Inclusiveness of Biometric Technologies for Individuals with Congenital Disabilities

Jascha Kolberg, Christian Rathgeb, Berglind Ólafsdóttir
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Biometric technologies are often advertised as a user-friendly way to authenticate individuals based on behavioural or biological characteristics. In recent years, biometric recognition has become ubiquitous in various application domains ranging from smartphone unlocking to border control. With the evolution of biometrics, ethical concerns have emerged with respect to the fairness or inclusiveness of these technologies. While many research efforts have been devoted towards investigating race and gender, little to no efforts have been put into studying the inclusiveness of biometric systems for disabled individuals. This work aims to address this gap in knowledge and shed light on this important matter. To this end, an online questionnaire as well as a usability study with smartphone biometrics was conducted with groups of disabled individuals. Obtained findings indicate disparities in the difficulties faced by disabled individuals compared to nondisabled individuals. Furthermore, it was observed that nondisabled individuals perceive biometric systems as being more inclusive towards disabled individuals than people living with disabilities perceive them to be. Moreover, the conducted usability experiment confirmed that accessibility issues are a real challenge for disabled individuals when using biometric systems.

Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences (DE), Danmarks Nationalbank (DK), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
0.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.