Jumping to Conclusions: A Visual Comparative Analysis of Online Debate Platform Layouts

There has been an increase in online debate platforms in recent years that allow individuals to exchange their opinions or to foster civic engagement. Even though the design of platforms has a significant influence on the quality of debates, research has yet to systematically analyze the graphical user interfaces of debate tools that are currently in use. To address this, we collected 25 off-the-shelf online debate platforms and conducted a comparative visual analysis of their graphical user interfaces. We identified different types of platforms, interface blocks, hierarchies, and display layout patterns. We found a strong similarity among these platforms in their design and a shared emphasis on individual input. Drawing from these insights, we discuss how the design of platforms frames the practice of debate and identify potential design dimensions in order to move beyond the existing boundaries of online debate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3679318.3685377
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jumping to Conclusions: A Visual Comparative Analysis of Online Debate Platform Layouts

Nathalie Bressa, Samuel Huron, Tallullah Frappier
1 citations
Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Social Media and Politics
0.93
article

Jumping to Conclusions: A Visual Comparative Analysis of Online Debate Platform Layouts

Nathalie Bressa, Samuel Huron, Tallullah Frappier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There has been an increase in online debate platforms in recent years that allow individuals to exchange their opinions or to foster civic engagement. Even though the design of platforms has a significant influence on the quality of debates, research has yet to systematically analyze the graphical user interfaces of debate tools that are currently in use. To address this, we collected 25 off-the-shelf online debate platforms and conducted a comparative visual analysis of their graphical user interfaces. We identified different types of platforms, interface blocks, hierarchies, and display layout patterns. We found a strong similarity among these platforms in their design and a shared emphasis on individual input. Drawing from these insights, we discuss how the design of platforms frames the practice of debate and identify potential design dimensions in order to move beyond the existing boundaries of online debate.

Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Télécom Paris (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Centre Européen de Sociologie et de Science Politique (FR), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Social Media and Politics
0.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.